Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30484547›Full record

ArticleAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Profile of dermatological consultations in Brazil (2018).

Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Hélio Amante Miot, Gerson de Oliveira Penna, Andréa Machado Coelho Ramos, Maria Lúcia Fernandes Penna, Sílvia Maria Schmidt, Flávio Barbosa Luz, Maria Auxiliadora Jeunon Sousa, Sérgio Luiz Lira Palma, José Antonio Sanches Junior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sociedade Brasileira de DermatologiaBrazilian Society of Dermatology (SBD) - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.
Hélio Amante MiotBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2596-9294
Gerson de Oliveira PennaTropical Medicine Nucleus, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília (DF), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-536X
Andréa Machado Coelho RamosHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-7486
Maria Lúcia Fernandes PennaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-8037
Sílvia Maria SchmidtBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-3719-0309
Flávio Barbosa LuzBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5454-8950
Maria Auxiliadora Jeunon SousaBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1549-1477
Sérgio Luiz Lira PalmaBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9056-4798
José Antonio Sanches JuniorBoard of directors of the Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5709-092X
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatological diseases are among the primary causes of the demand for basic health care. Studies on the frequency of dermatoses are important for the proper management of health planning.

objectivesTo evaluate the nosological and behavioral profiles of dermatological consultations in Brazil.

methodsThe Brazilian Society of Dermatology invited all of its members to complete an online form on patients who sought consultations from March 21-26, 2018. The form contained questions about patient demographics, consultation type according to the patient's funding, the municipality of the consultation, diagnosis, treatments and procedures. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions were compared between subgroups.

resultsData from 9629 visits were recorded. The most frequent causes for consultation were acne (8.0%), photoaging (7.7%), nonmelanoma skin cancer (5.4%), and actinic keratosis (4.7%). The identified diseases had distinct patterns with regard to gender, skin color, geographic region, type of funding for the consultation, and age group. Concerning the medical conducts, photoprotection was indicated in 44% of consultations, surgical diagnostic procedures were performed in 7.3%, surgical therapeutic procedures were conducted in 19.2%, and cosmetic procedures were performed in 7.1%. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized survey, with a sample period of one week.

conclusionThis research allowed us to identify the epidemiological profiles of the demands of outpatients for dermatologists in various contexts. The results also highlight the importance of aesthetic demands in privately funded consultations and the significance of diseases such as acne, nonmelanoma skin cancer, leprosy, and psoriasis to public health.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSex Distribution

Identifiers

PMID30484547
PMCPMC6256211
OpenAlexW2901097146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.