ArticleTrends in hearing
Contrasting Effects of Pressure Compensation on TEOAE and DPOAE in Children With Negative Middle Ear Pressure.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estrogen deficiency and risk of hearing loss in pediatric Turner syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Trial
- [Characteristic analysis of otoacoustic emission compensating middle ear pressure in patients with middle ear negative pressure].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Otoacoustic Emissions in Children with Long-Term Middle Ear Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In children with normal cochlear acuity, middle ear fluid often abolishes otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) reduces them. No convincing evidence of beneficial pressure compensation on distortion product OAE (DPOAE) has yet been presented. Two studies aimed to document effects of NMEP on transient OAE (TEOAE) and DPOAE. In Study 1, TEOAE and DPOAE pass/fail responses were analyzed before and after pressure compensation in 50 consecutive qualifying referrals having NMEP from -100 to -299 daPa. Study 2 concentrated on DPOAE, recording both amplitude (distortion product amplitude) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) before and after pressure compensation. Of the 20 participants, 5 had both ears qualifying. An effect of compensation on meeting a pass criterion was present in TEOAE for both left and right ear data in Study 1 but not demonstrable in DPOAE. In Study 2, the distortion product amplitude compensation effect was marginal overall, and depended on recording frequency band. SNR values improved moderately after pressure compensation in the two (overlapping) sets of single-ear data. In the five cases with both ears qualifying, a stronger compensation effect size, over 3 dB, was seen. The absolute dependence of SNR on frequency was also strongly replicated, but in no analysis, the frequency × compensation interaction was significant. Independent of particular frequency range, the data support a limited SNR improvement in 2 to 3 dB for compensation in DPOAE, with slightly larger effects in ears giving SNRs between 0 dB and +6 dB, where pass/fail cutoffs would generally be located.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.