Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30484213›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2019

Effect of bisphosphonate treatment on the jawbone: an exploratory study using periapical and panoramic radiographic evaluation.

Imad Barngkgei, Esam Halboub, Abeer Almashraqi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Key insights into antiresorptive drug use and osteonecrosis in osteoporotic patients undergoing tooth extractions: A clinical and CBCT assessment.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Imad BarngkgeiDepartment of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Syrian Private University (SPU), Daraa Road, Der Ali, Damascus, Syria. imadbarn@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-5818
Esam HalboubDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Sabya Main Street, Alshwajera, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1894-470X
Abeer AlmashraqiDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Sabya Main Street, Alshwajera, Jazan, 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Jazan University · SASyrian Private University · SY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis cross-sectional study aimed to explore potential jawbone changes secondary to bisphosphonate (BP) treatment of osteoporosis using digital panoramic and periapical radiography.

methodsThirty-nine women, previously examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, were radiographed by digital panoramic and/or periapical radiography. On periapical radiographs, trabecular bone structure and fractal dimension analyses of the mandibular first molar and edentulous regions were performed. On panoramic radiographs, the mandibular cortical width (MCW) was calculated, and trabecular bone structure and fractal dimension analyses of the trabecular bone in the alveolar and basal bones were performed. The results were compared between patients treated or not treated with BP using linear regression analysis to adjust for potential confounding factors.

resultsThe analyses of periapical and panoramic radiological images showed no statistical differences in the jawbones between groups after bisphosphonate use for mean intervals of 4.3 and 5 years; respectively. Although the mandibular cortical width on panoramic radiography was correlated with BP use, it was not noted to be statistically significant.

conclusionsThe trabecular parts of the alveolar and basal bones and the MCW were not significantly altered by BP treatment in patients with osteoporosis over 4.3-5 years, as detected by digital periapical and panoramic radiography. The low dosages of bisphosphonates used in the treatment of osteoporosis may explain this lack of change in MCW. Dental radiographs should not be considered as a method to monitor BP-induced jaw bone alterations among osteoporotic patients.

Indexed as

Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the JawBone DensityDiphosphonatesRadiography, PanoramicAbsorptiometry, PhotonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansOsteoporosisDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesDental radiographyOsteoporosisPanoramic radiography

Identifiers

PMID30484213
OpenAlexW2899827580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.