ArticleOral radiology2019
Incidental findings during head and neck MRI screening in 1717 patients with temporomandibular disorders.
Article in Oral radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for temporomandibular joint anomalies on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Augmented 3T imaging performance of the Temporomandibular joint using wireless resonators.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2026Article
- Article
- Season, Age and Sex-Related Differences in Incidental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Paranasal Sinuses in Adults.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the evaluation of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). At our institution, we perform additional head and neck screening using head coils when performing MRI screening of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) to detect lesions in areas other than the TMJ (lesions discovered by chance, or incidental findings; IFs) and to conduct a diagnosis of exclusion. The objective of this study was to determine the number and frequency of IFs detected during head and neck screening, according to sites and diseases. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study evaluated 1717 patients with clinically suspected TMDs who underwent MRI of the TMJ. IFs were assessed on horizontal sections of images of the craniofacial region obtained by the short tau inversion recovery imaging technique.
resultsThe patients undergoing MRI of the TMJ comprised 433 males and 1284 females. Among the patients, at least one IF was detected on images in 461 patients. The most common IF site was the maxillary sinus. Based on diagnostic imaging, there were 21 IFs (1.2%) associated with TMD symptoms, or for which an association with TMD symptoms could not be ruled out.
conclusionsCombination of conventional MRI imaging of the TMJ with craniofacial MRI screening may allow detection of lesions other than TMDs, thereby confirming the usefulness of MRI. Detection of IFs may require development of different therapeutic strategies than those for TMDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30484187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.