Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483971›Full record

Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2019

Randomized trial of a web-based survivor intervention on melanoma prevention behaviors of first-degree relatives.

Deborah J Bowen, Jennifer Hay, Hendrika Meischke, Joni A Mayer, Julie Harris-Wai, Wylie Burke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effectiveness of theCirculation · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deborah J BowenBioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. dbowen@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-4422
Jennifer HayMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hendrika MeischkeHealth Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Joni A MayerGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Julie Harris-WaiUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wylie BurkeBioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
Communication Intervention with Melanoma FamiliesR01CA107430 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BOWEN, DEBORAH J. · 2004 to 2007
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA107430NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107430NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMelanoma can be prevented through reducing sun exposure and detected early by increasing examination of skin for lesions. First-degree relatives of melanoma cases have higher risk than the general population and, therefore, could be targets of behavioral interventions through families. We tested the effects of a family-based web delivered intervention to melanoma families on the melanoma risk reduction behaviors of first-degree relatives of melanoma cases.

methodsA total of 313 families that included one first-degree relative were recruited to join this randomized trial. All intervention families received access to the Suntalk website developed to promote family communication and behavioral risk reduction among families of melanoma survivors.

resultsFirst degree relatives in the intervention arm significantly increased their yearly performance of both skin self examination and thorough provider examination from baseline to 12-month follow-up while the control FDRs decreased their yearly performance of both of those behaviors (p's = 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). Several sun protection behaviors increased significantly in FDRs in the intervention arm but not the control arm, including wearing a covering on the head (p = 0.005), staying in available shade (p = 0.008), and avoiding sun exposure during peak hours (p = 0.010). Some of these changes were mediated by perceptions of risk and other process variables.

conclusionsA web-based intervention can reduce risk of melanoma through changes in relevant behaviors among first-degree relatives of melanoma survivors. Future research should identify methods for making this type of intervention accessible to more families and for broadening the reach to other types of cancer families. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This program can be provided to melanoma families to improve their sun protection and screening behaviors, at the point of diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternetMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf-ExaminationSkin NeoplasmsYoung AdultFamilyFirst-degree relativesMelanomaPreventionSun exposure

Identifiers

PMID30483971
PMCPMC6436968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.