Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483899›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Impact of image guidance on toxicity and tumour outcome in moderately hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

B A Jereczek-Fossa, A Maucieri, G Marvaso, S Gandini, C Fodor, D Zerini, G Riva, O Alessandro, A Surgo, S Volpe and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: updated long-term outcome and toxicity analysis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

B A Jereczek-FossaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A MaucieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
G MarvasoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. giulia.marvaso@ieo.it.
S GandiniDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Adamello 16, 20139, Milan, Italy.
C FodorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
D ZeriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
G RivaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
O AlessandroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A SurgoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
S VolpeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
G FanettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
S ArculeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
M A ZerellaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
S ParisiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
P MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A VavassoriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
F CattaniUnit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
R CambriaUnit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
C GaribaldiRadiation Research Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
A StarzyńskaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
G MusiDepartment of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
O De CobelliDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
M FerroDepartment of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
F NolèMedical Oncology Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
D CiardoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
R OrecchiaScientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITGdańsk Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To report toxicity and efficacy outcome of moderately hypofractionated image-guided external-beam radiotherapy in a large series of patients treated for prostate cancer (PCa). Between 10/2006 and 12/2015, 572 T1-T3N0M0 PCa patients received 70.2 Gy in 26 fractions at 2.7 Gy/fraction: 344 patients (60%) with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and 228 (40%) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria and Houston definition (nadir + 2) were used for toxicity and biochemical failure evaluation, respectively. Median age was 74 years (interquartile range 69-77). Compared with 3D-CRT, in IMRT group more high-risk patients (29% vs 18%; P = 0.002) and more high-volume target (75% vs 60%; P < 0.001) were included. Acute gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity G > 1 were registered in 8% and in 11% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively, whereas late GI G > 1 were observed in 2% and 16% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively. Acute genito-urinary (GU) toxicity G > 1 were registered in 26% and 40% IMRT and 3D-CRT patients, respectively, whereas late GU G > 1 occurred in 5% IMRT and 15% 3D-CRT patients. Multivariate proportional hazard Cox models confirmed significantly greater risk of late toxicity with 3D-CRT compared to IMRT for GU > 1 (P = 0.004) and for GI > 1 (P < 0.001). With a median 4-year follow-up, overall survival (OS), clinical progression-free survival (cPFS) and biochemical PFS (bPFS) for the whole series were 91%, 92% and 91%, respectively. cPFS and bPFS were significantly different by risk groups. Multivariate Cox models for bPFS and cPFS showed no difference between irradiation techniques and a significant impact of risk group and initial PSA. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy is a viable treatment option for localized PCa with excellent tumour control and satisfactory toxicity profile. IMRT seems associated with a reduction in toxicity, whereas tumour control was equal between IMRT and 3D-CRT patients and depended mainly on the risk category.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesDose escalationHypofractionationImage-guided radiotherapyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30483899
OpenAlexW2903356036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.