ReviewDer Pathologe2018
[Circulating tumor cells in pancreatic cancer : Results of morphological and molecular analyses and comparisons with the primary tumor].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with gemcitabine chemotherapy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Circulating Hybrid Cells Join the Fray of Circulating Cellular Biomarkers.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a disease with a poor prognosis. PDAC shows characteristic mutations within codon 12/13. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detected in blood samples of patients with cancer are hypothesized as the means of systemic tumor spread. But less is known about morphological/molecular characteristics or the pathophysiological meaning of PDAC CTC.
objectivesThe aim of the study was a cytomorphological and genetic analysis of CTC from patients with PDAC followed by the correlation of the results with those of the corresponding tumor in the pancreas. MATERIAL AND
methodsBlood samples of 58 patients with PDAC and 10 "normal" control donors were processed through a size-based CTC isolation. KRAS-mutation analyses were performed for CTC and the primary tumor and the results were compared. Furthermore, their potential as a prognostic marker was evaluated.
resultsIn patients with different UICC stages CTC were detected, but not in normal control patients. There was a trend for a worse median overall survival (OS) for patients with >3 CTC/ml. Patients with a KRAS
conclusionsDetection and characterization of CTC (for example by KRAS mutation analysis) may be useful for prognosis. Furthermore, it expands our knowledge of tumor biology and may detect possible tumor heterogeneity regarding the mutation profile of some cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.