ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2018
[Clavicular fractures : Diagnostics, management and treatment].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Clavicular fractures : Diagnostics, treatment and management].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Multimodal Exercises Adjunct to Virtual Reality in Acromioclavicular Joint Sprain Rehabilitation: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Novel sternoclavicular hook plate for the treatment of posterior sternoclavicular dislocation: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- [Clavicle fractures: practical approach in clinical routine].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- [Clavicle shaft fractures in childhood and adolescence : Consensus report of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Society for Trauma Surgery].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Excellent clinical and radiological outcome following locking compression plate fixation of displaced medial clavicle fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.European journal of medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clavicular fractures account for approximately 6% of bony injuries of the shoulder girdle. Patients suffering from this type of injury show 2 peaks (at the 2nd and 8th decades of life) where the majority occur in young active patients during recreational and sports activities. Besides an accurate patient history with a focus on the trauma mechanism, the clinical and radiological investigations are the cornerstones of the diagnostics. Slightly displaced fractures in a pediatric population as well as non-displaced fractures in adults can be treated conservatively. In cases of shortening and/or displacement and high functional demands, operative treatment of clavicular fractures, stable fixation and the possibility of early mobilization and therapy can be achieved; however, the indications for the procedure also depend on other factors. Surgical stabilization can substantially reduce the danger of non-union, which is why it is becoming more important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.