Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483843›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

Magnetic resonance imaging performed before and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: predictive factors of recurrence and prognostic significance of MR-detected extramural venous invasion.

Francesco Prampolini, Stefania Taschini, Annarita Pecchi, Francesco Sani, Andrea Spallanzani, Fabio Gelsomino, Shaniko Kaleci, Pietro Torricelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. MRI for Rectal Cancer: Updates and Controversies-AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco PrampoliniDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. prampolini.francesco@tiscali.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-7036
Stefania TaschiniDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-8946
Annarita PecchiDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-3256
Francesco SaniDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1184-7827
Andrea SpallanzaniDepartment of Oncology and Haematology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-7139
Fabio GelsominoDepartment of Oncology and Haematology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-4795
Shaniko KaleciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1166-2961
Pietro TorricelliDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-3063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in predicting risk of recurrence in rectal cancer and to investigate the prognostic significance of MR-detected extramural venous invasion (mr-EMVI) and of its regression after nCRT.

methodsDuring 2005-2016, 87 patients with rectal cancer underwent pre- and post-nCRT MRI before surgery. Two radiologists independently reviewed MR examinations retrospectively, assessing T stage, nodal involvement, circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, and mr-EMVI. All four parameters assessed in pre- and post-nCRT MRI were correlated with the risk of recurrence. Correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) was investigated for significant predictive factors in pre-nCRT MRI and for mr-EMVI and its possible regression in post-nCRT MRI.

results15 of 87 patients developed recurrence, with a relapse-rate of 17.2%. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between CRM involvement and mr-EMVI assessed in pre-nCRT MRI and the risk of recurrence; 3 years-DFS in patients positive for these two parameters was significantly shorter compared with negatives. In post-nCRT MRI, all four parameters correlated significantly with recurrence: mr-EMVI affected significantly 3 years-DFS and its regression after nCRT correlated with a trend toward improvement of survival outcomes, although not statistically significant.

conclusionsCRM involvement and mr-EMVI assessed in pre-nCRT MRI should be considered early predictive factors of recurrence in rectal cancer. MRI performed after nCRT has a significant value in predicting risk of recurrence: mr-EMVI confirmed to be a poor prognosis predictor and its regression or persistence after nCRT could have influences on treatment and follow-up strategies.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesExtramural venous invasion (EMVI)MRIPredictive factorsPreoperative chemoradiotherapyRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.