Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483639›Full record

ReviewForensic sciences research2017

Forensic application of comet assay: an emerging technique.

Ritesh Kumar Shukla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Forensic sciences research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ritesh Kumar ShuklaDivision of Biological and Life Sciences, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem interval (PMI) estimation is a recurring problem in the field of forensic medicine. Conventional methods are effective but are insufficient to estimate accurate and precise time of death or PMI. In addition, degradation of biological samples is another major problem in forensic science which affects the investigation process and misleads the result. Some previous studies reported that DNA fragmentation has strong correlation with PMI. DNA fragmentation increased with prolonged PMI. Comet assay is a rapid sensitive, versatile, reliable and cost effective technique that is specifically used for qualitative and quantitative estimation of nuclear DNA fragmentation. Due to this attribute, comet assay can help to estimate accurate and precise time of death for some extent that is for early PMI estimation. In addition, two confounding factors are responsible for DNA fragmentation: (1) micro-organism; (2) environmental condition. Here, comet assay plays a dual role: (1) partially degraded samples get repaired using repair enzyme; (2) accurate time since deposition can be measured without using repair enzyme. Furthermore, this assay can also help to identify potential exposures of environmental-released chemicals/toxicants and its deleterious effects on human population. In this way, comet assay shows its versatile applications that could be useful for forensic investigation. Therefore, with the help of this review, an attempt was made to explore the versatility of comet assay technique for forensic applications and its future perspective.

Indexed as

comet assayDNA fragmentationDNA repairforensic applicationForensic sciencePMIsingle-cell gel electrophoresis

Identifiers

PMID30483639
PMCPMC6197085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.