ArticleForensic sciences research2017
Massively parallel sequencing of 231 autosomal SNPs with a custom panel: a SNP typing assay developed for human identification with Ion Torrent PGM.
Article in Forensic sciences research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Deubiquitylase Otub1 Regulates the Chemotactic Response of Splenic B Cells by Modulating the Stability of the γ-Subunit Gng2.Molecular and cellular biology · 2024Article
- A Novel Homozygous Missense Mutation in the Zinc Finger DNA Binding Domain of GLI1 Causes Recessive Post-Axial Polydactyly.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A SNP panel for identification of DNA and RNA specimens.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The custom-designed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel amplified 231 autosomal SNPs in one PCR reaction and subsequently sequenced with massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology and Ion Torrent personal genome machine (PGM). SNPs were chosen from SNPforID, IISNP, HapMap, dbSNP, and related published literatures. Full concordance was obtained between available MPS calling and Sanger sequencing with 9947A and 9948 controls. Ten SNPs (rs4606077, rs334355, rs430046, rs2920816, rs4530059, rs1478829, rs1498553, rs7141285, rs12714757 and rs2189011) with low coverage or heterozygote imbalance should be optimized or excluded from the panel. Sequence data had sufficiently high coverage and gave reliable SNP calling for the remaining 221 loci with the custom MPS-SNP panel. A default DNA input amount of 10 ng per reaction was recommended by Ampliseq technology but sensitivity testing revealed positive results from as little as 1 ng input DNA. Mixture testing with this panel is possible through analysis of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.