Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483582›Full record

ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2018

Systematic review of histological remission criteria in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Ransome Eke, Tong Li, Anna White, Tooba Tariq, Jonathan Markowitz, Andrey Lenov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and children in Canada: a Delphi consensus project.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Treatment Response in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ransome EkeDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Western Michigan University M.D. Homer Stryker School of Medicine Kalamazoo Michigan US.ORCID 0000-0003-2148-4414
Tong LiDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Western Michigan University M.D. Homer Stryker School of Medicine Kalamazoo Michigan US.
Anna WhiteMedical Library Western Michigan University M.D. Homer Stryker School of Medicine Kalamazoo Michigan US.
Tooba TariqDepartment of Internal Medicine Western Michigan University M.D. Homer Stryker School of Medicine Kalamazoo Michigan US.
Jonathan MarkowitzDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology Greenville Children's Hospital Greenville South Carolina US.
Andrey LenovAllergy-Asthma-Immunology Clinic, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Western Michigan University M.D. Homer Stryker School of Medicine Kalamazoo Michigan US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elemental diets, dietary elimination, and steroid therapies are the most common therapies in the clinical trials for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Histological findings (usually reported as eosinophils per microscopic high-powered field [hpf]) remain the most common end-point used to define response. Yet, the threshold for defining "response" and "remission" are ill-defined among consensus guidelines and may vary from study to study. We conducted a systematic literature review of articles on eosinophilic esophagitis, published between January 2007 and November 2017, considering histological remission as the primary outcome. We abstracted treatment information and definitions of histological remission or response. A comparison of definitions of histological remission across and within institutions was performed. A total of 61 articles were included in this review, with approximately 60% of the studies published from centers in the United States. Histological definitions of remission of EoE ranged from 0 to ≤20 eosinophils/hpf. The most stringent criteria, ranging from 0 to ≤5 eosinophils/hpf, were commonly used in interventional trial studies that examined the effects of new treatments. We found remarkable variability in definitions between studies, treatment types, and regions. Age or epidemiological distribution of study subjects did not influence the criteria for histological remission. Clinical and histological improvements are important measures of the effects of treatment. Histological findings, the most objective measure of treatment, should provide an optimal method for comparing the effectiveness of various treatments. Yet, our findings suggest a lack of consistent remission criteria in published studies. Considering these inconsistencies, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of various treatments.

Indexed as

eosinophilic esophagitishistologicalimprovementremissionresponsetreatmenttrial

Identifiers

PMID30483582
PMCPMC6207047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.