ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2018
Colonization of
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Affecting the Intraluminal Therapy forMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Follow the Metaplasia: Characteristics and Oncogenic Implications of Metaplasia's Pattern of Spread Throughout the Stomach.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- The Impact of Gastric Juice pH on the Intraluminal Therapy forJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimTo assess the detection rates of
methodsEighty consecutive dyspeptic patients with confirmed H. pylori infection (serology and
resultsOf 80 enrolled patients, 17 (21.3%) and 44 (55%) had positive findings with the UFT300 at 5 and 30 min, respectively, while 72 (90%) had positive findings with the CLO test at 24 h. The CLO test is significantly more sensitive than the UFT300 in evaluating H. pylori status in the cardia. On comparing patients with and without carditis, the detection rates of the CLO test were similar (91.1%
conclusionsThe rate of H. pylori colonization in the gastric cardia was 90% in H. pylori-infected patients detected with the CLO test. Although the UFT300 provides a more rapid reading of H. pylori status, the diagnostic yield of the CLO test is much higher than that of the UFT300. However, a positive result of the UFT300 may indicate a higher bacterial load in the cardia, which warrants a more effective therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.