Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483526›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2017

Comparing swallowing of capsule to endoscopic placement of capsule endoscopy in children.

Christopher J Burgess, Emma C McIntyre, Geoffrey D Withers, Looi C Ee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05522101 (Mini-sized Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs. Normal-sized CE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years:A Prospective,Multi-center,Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05522101 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Mini-sized Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs. Normal-sized CE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years:A Prospective,Multi-center,Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled158ConditionsSmall Bowel DiseaseArmsMini-sized MCE, Normal-sized MCE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age Is a Risk Factor for Gastroscopy-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy in Children.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Capsule Endoscopy in Children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J BurgessDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Lady Cilento Children's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6056-2684
Emma C McIntyreDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Lady Cilento Children's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Geoffrey D WithersDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Lady Cilento Children's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Looi C EeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant Lady Cilento Children's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUQueensland Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimCapsule endoscopy (CE) offers a method of directly visualizing areas of the small bowel not accessible by conventional endoscopy. Some children are unable to swallow the capsule requiring endoscopic placement under general anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to identify any differences between children requiring endoscopic placement and those able to swallow the capsule.

methodsRetrospective chart review of consecutive CE in a tertiary pediatric center was conducted. Patient demographics, outcomes, and complications between the two groups were noted. Paired

resultsA total of 104 CEs were performed in 88 patients, median age 12.8 (range: 1.6-18.5) years. Almost half, 49% (51/104), swallowed the capsule. Children requiring endoscopic placement were significantly younger (9.8

conclusionsCE is safe and well tolerated in children. Children requiring endoscopic placement were significantly younger, lighter, had longer small intestine transit time, and less likely to have positive findings. Concurrent biopsies during capsule placement increase the likelihood of inadequate views but did not affect outcome or management.

Indexed as

capsule endoscopychildgastroscopy

Identifiers

PMID30483526
PMCPMC6207005
OpenAlexW2754263884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.