ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2018
Influence of thickness and incisal extension of indirect veneers on the biomechanical behavior of maxillary canine teeth.
Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Survival Rate and Laboratory Failure of Dental Veneers: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Effect of three different veneering techniques on the stress distribution and in vitro fatigue behavior of core-veneer all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2021Article
- Mechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class II.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2020Article
- Lithium Disilicate Crown, Zirconia Hybrid Abutment and Platform Switching to Improve the Esthetics in Anterior Region: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2020Article
- Effect of the restorative technique on load-bearing capacity, cusp deflection, and stress distribution of endodontically-treated premolars with MOD restoration.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyze the influence of thickness and incisal extension of indirect veneers on the stress and strain generated in maxillary canine teeth. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 3-dimensional maxillary canine model was validated with an
resultsThe results showed a mean of 218.16 µstrain of stress in the
conclusionsThe mathematical model for a maxillary canine tooth was validated using FEA. The thickness (0.3 or 0.8 mm) and the incisal covering showed no difference for the tooth structure. However, the incisal covering was harmful for the veneer, of which the greatest thickness was beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.