ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2018
Comparing advanced graph-theoretical parameters of the connectomes of the lobes of the human brain.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- The braingraph.org database with more than 1000 robust human connectomes in five resolutions.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- Article
- Good neighbors, bad neighbors: the frequent network neighborhood mapping of the hippocampus enlightens several structural factors of the human intelligence on a 414-subject cohort.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The frequent subgraphs of the connectome of the human brain.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep, classical graph-theoretical parameters, like the size of the minimum vertex cover, the chromatic number, or the eigengap of the adjacency matrix of the graph were studied widely by mathematicians in the last century. Most researchers today study much simpler parameters of braingraphs or connectomes which were defined in the last twenty years for enormous networks-like the graph of the World Wide Web-with hundreds of millions of nodes. Since the connectomes, describing the connections of the human brain, typically contain several hundred vertices today, one can compute and analyze the much deeper, harder-to-compute classical graph parameters for these, relatively small graphs of the brain. This deeper approach has proven to be very successful in the comparison of the connectomes of the sexes in our earlier works: we have shown that graph parameters, deeply characterizing the graph connectivity are significantly better in women's connectomes than in men's. In the present contribution we compare numerous graph parameters in the three largest lobes-frontal, parietal, temporal-and in both hemispheres of the human brain. We apply the diffusion weighted imaging data of 423 subjects of the NIH-funded Human Connectome Project, and present some findings, never described before, including that the right parietal lobe contains significantly more edges, has higher average degree, density, larger minimum vertex cover and Hoffman bound than the left parietal lobe. Similar advantages in the deep graph connectivity properties are held for the left frontal versus the right frontal and the right temporal versus the left temporal lobes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.