Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483353›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2018

What information do cancer patients want and how well are their needs being met?

Gek Phin Chua, Hiang Khoon Tan, Mihir Gandhi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Designing a Pragmatic Intervention to Help Improve the Bladder Cancer Patient Experience.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Information experiences among women diagnosed with endometrial cancer: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Living with brain metastasis - a qualitative study of patients' and family members' coping strategies.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. The Functioning of Hospice in the Perception of Family Members of Cancer Surgery and Hospice Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Experiences of cancer patients about seeking health information: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer Survivors: What Are Their Information Seeking Behaviours?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gek Phin ChuaNational Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, 169610, Singapore.
Hiang Khoon TanNational Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, 169610, Singapore.
Mihir GandhiSingapore Clinical Research Institute, 31 Biopolis Way Nanos, #02-01, 138669, Singapore.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGSingapore Clinical Research Institute · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study is to determine the type of information cancer patients need and to measure the extent to which these information needs are met by measuring patients' levels of satisfaction. A self-administered questionnaire developed through extensive literature reviews was pilot tested on 11 cancer patients using convenience sampling in a large ambulatory cancer centre in Singapore. All eligible patients attending the centre during a 5-month period were invited to complete the 76-item survey that had been designed to evaluate self-reported information needs and level of satisfaction with the information received while undergoing cancer treatment. The importance of information and the level of satisfaction with needs being met were assessed with the 5-point Likert scale. A total of 411 patients (50%) completed the survey. Almost all patients wanted information about the disease, tests and investigations, treatment, side-effects, sexuality, psychosocial support and financial matters, and most items listed in the questions in each selection were rated as important or very important. Responses indicate that patients were generally satisfied with the information provided especially on diagnosis and diagnostic tests, treatment and overall experience but there are information needs that need to be addressed more efficiently and effectively. The findings of this study support previous research which indicates that cancer patients who are receiving treatment have many information needs. Respondents were generally satisfied with the information provided, although some discrepancies were noted which reflect the complexities associated with cancer patient education.

Indexed as

cancercommunicationimportance of informationpatient information needssatisfactionsexualitysupportive care background

Identifiers

PMID30483353
PMCPMC6214674
OpenAlexW2893925659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.