ReviewFrontiers in genetics2018
Use of Mendelian
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mendelian Randomization Studies of Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Cancers: A PRISMA Review and Meta-Analysis.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Testing for causality between systematically identified risk factors and glioma: a Mendelian randomization study.BMC cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Integrating machine learning with mendelian randomization for unveiling causal gene networks in glioblastoma multiforme.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Causal inference between immune cells and glioblastoma: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring the Role of Immune Cells in Glioma: Causal Associations and Clinical Implications.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Role of DNA methylation in the relationship between glioma risk factors and glioma incidence: a two-step Mendelian randomization study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Pre-diagnostic blood biomarkers for adult glioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Severe mental illness and the risk of breast cancer: A two-sample, two-step multivariable Mendelian randomization study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Sleep duration, genetic susceptibility, and Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal UK Biobank-based study.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- A State-of-the-Art Roadmap for Biomarker-Driven Drug Development in the Era of Personalized Therapies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- The Role of Network Science in Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2021Review
- Transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization study prioritising novel tissue-dependent genes for glioma susceptibility.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Epidemiology, genetic epidemiology and Mendelian randomisation: more need than ever to attend to detail.Human genetics · 2020Article
- Serum Uric Acid Level and Multiple Sclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Risk factors for childhood and adult primary brain tumors.Neuro-oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gliomas are a group of primary brain tumors, the most common and aggressive subtype of which is glioblastoma. Glioblastoma has a median survival of just 15 months after diagnosis. Only previous exposure to ionizing radiation and particular inherited genetic syndromes are accepted risk factors for glioma; the vast majority of cases are thought to occur spontaneously. Previous observational studies have described associations between several risk factors and glioma, but studies are often conflicting and whether these associations reflect true casual relationships is unclear because observational studies may be susceptible to confounding, measurement error and reverse causation. Mendelian randomization (MR) is a form of instrumental variable analysis that can be used to provide supporting evidence for causal relationships between exposures (e.g., risk factors) and outcomes (e.g., disease onset). MR utilizes genetic variants, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), that are robustly associated with an exposure to determine whether there is a causal effect of the exposure on the outcome. MR is less susceptible to confounding, reverse causation and measurement errors as it is based on the random inheritance during conception of genetic variants that can be relatively accurately measured. In previous studies, MR has implicated a genetically predicted increase in telomere length with an increased risk of glioma, and found little evidence that obesity related factors, vitamin D or atopy are causal in glioma risk. In this review, we describe MR and its potential use to discover and validate novel risk factors, mechanistic factors, and therapeutic targets in glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.