Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483287›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

Coffee Somatic Embryogenesis: How Did Research, Experience Gained and Innovations Promote the Commercial Propagation of Elite Clones From the Two Cultivated Species?

Hervé Etienne, David Breton, Jean-Christophe Breitler, Benoît Bertrand, Eveline Déchamp, Rayan Awada, Pierre Marraccini, Sophie Léran, Edgardo Alpizar, Claudine Campa and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. FFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AutotetraploidFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hervé EtienneCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
David BretonNestlé R&D Center Tours - Plant Science Research Unit, Tours, France.
Jean-Christophe BreitlerCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Benoît BertrandCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Eveline DéchampCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Rayan AwadaCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Pierre MarracciniCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Sophie LéranCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Edgardo AlpizarECOM, Exportadora Atlantic, Managua, Nicaragua.
Claudine CampaIRD, CIRAD, Université de Montpellier, IPME, Montpellier, France.
Philippe CourtelECOM, Exportadora Atlantic, Managua, Nicaragua.
Frédéric GeorgetCIRAD, UMR IPME, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Paul DucosNestlé R&D Center Tours - Plant Science Research Unit, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1990s, somatic embryogenesis (SE) has enabled the propagation of selected varieties, Arabica F1 hybrid and Robusta clones, originating from the two cultivated coffee species,

Indexed as

bioreactorscuttingsinnovationsomaclonal variationtechnology transfer

Identifiers

PMID30483287
PMCPMC6240679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.