Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483201›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Hemispheric Asymmetries in Radial Line Bisection: Role of Retinotopic and Spatiotopic Factors.

Sergio Chieffi, Giovanni Messina, Ines Villano, Antonietta Messina, Ciro Rosario Ilardi, Marcellino Monda, Monica Salerno, Francesco Sessa, Maria Pina Mollica, Gina Cavaliere and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sergio ChieffiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni MessinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Ines VillanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Antonietta MessinaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Unit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Ciro Rosario IlardiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Marcellino MondaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Unit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Monica SalernoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco SessaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Maria Pina MollicaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gina CavaliereDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giovanna TrincheseDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabiano CimminoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paolo MurabitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Angela CatapanoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo MondaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology and Unit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies showed that healthy individuals bisect radial lines oriented along the midsagittal plane farther than the true center (distal bisection bias). It was proposed that the distal bisection bias depended on the presence of an attention bias directed toward far space (distal attention bias) and that this bias is related to the activity of the occipitotemporal visual processing stream. Other studies have also suggested that a similar distal attention bias is linked to the activity of the right hemisphere. In the present experiment we investigated whether distal bisection bias increased when radial lines were placed in the left hemispace. Furthermore, we also examined whether the bisection bias was enhanced by the use of the left hand, as left hand movements are mainly controlled by the right hemisphere. Right-handed participants were asked to bisect radial lines presented below eye level along the midsagittal plane (central lines), or laterally and parallel to the midsagittal plane, in the left or right hemispace (left and right lines, respectively). Participants used their right or left hand. The results showed that participants consistently bisected left and central radial lines farther than (i) the true center and (ii) the subjective midpoint of right radial lines. Conversely, they bisected accurately right radial lines. The hand did not influence bisection error. The present study suggests that the distal bisection bias found in the bisection of left radial lines might depend on the presence of a distal attention bias related to right hemisphere activity. The relative contribution of retinotopic and spatiotopic factors in producing the distal bisection bias is discussed.

Indexed as

distal biashemispheric asymmetryline bisectionradial linesretinotopic factorsspatiotopic factors

Identifiers

PMID30483201
PMCPMC6240617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.