Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30483066›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2018

Large Volume Electron Microscopy and Neural Microcircuit Analysis.

Yoshiyuki Kubota, Jaerin Sohn, Yasuo Kawaguchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Updates in renal pathology.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Volume electron microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoshiyuki KubotaDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences (NIPS), Okazaki, Japan.
Jaerin SohnDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences (NIPS), Okazaki, Japan.
Yasuo KawaguchiDivision of Cerebral Circuitry, National Institute for Physiological Sciences (NIPS), Okazaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One recent technical innovation in neuroscience is microcircuit analysis using three-dimensional reconstructions of neural elements with a large volume Electron microscopy (EM) data set. Large-scale data sets are acquired with newly-developed electron microscope systems such as automated tape-collecting ultramicrotomy (ATUM) with scanning EM (SEM), serial block-face EM (SBEM) and focused ion beam-SEM (FIB-SEM). Currently, projects are also underway to develop computer applications for the registration and segmentation of the serially-captured electron micrographs that are suitable for analyzing large volume EM data sets thoroughly and efficiently. The analysis of large volume data sets can bring innovative research results. These recently available techniques promote our understanding of the functional architecture of the brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicrotomyNanotubesNerve NetATUMcarbon nanotubeconnectomeFIB-SEMSBEMsegmentationsynapsevolume electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID30483066
PMCPMC6240581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.