ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2018
The Patient Experience of Integrated Care Scale: A Validation Study among Patients with Chronic Conditions Seen in Primary Care.
Article in International journal of integrated care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of standardized brief geriatric evaluation compared with routine care in general practice for preventing functional decline: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Trial
- Article
- Quality of integrated care for patients with multimorbidity in China: a Servqual Model analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Advancing health equity in Nova Scotia by exploring gaps in healthcare delivery: a mixed methods protocol.Research in health services & regions · 2025Article
- Patients' experience of integrated nursing care in general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study.Family practice · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the Chinese patient-centered integrated care scale.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Reconciling validity and challenges of patient comfort and understanding: Guidelines to patient-oriented questionnaires.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Development of a patient-reported experience measure for chronic inflammatory skin diseases.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022Article
- Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Factors associated with care transition experiences among individuals with complex needs: A prospective study.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionValid and comprehensive instruments to measure integrated care are required to capture patient experience and improve quality of patient care. This study aimed to validate the Patient Experience of Integrated Care Scale (PEICS), among patients with chronic conditions seen in primary care.
methodsOne hundred and fifty-nine (159) French-speaking adults with at least one chronic condition were recruited in two family medicine clinics in Quebec (Canada) and completed the 17-item PEICS (T1). Fifty (50) participants completed it a second time 2 weeks later (T2). The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, the test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and concurrent validity using three dimensions of the Continuity of Care from Multiple Clinicians (CC-MC), with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.
resultsCronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.91). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.90) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with the three dimensions of the CC-MC varied from 0.44 to 0.54. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: The PEICS showed good psychometric properties. This scale could be used in a population with chronic conditions followed in primary care to measure patient experience of integrated care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.