Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482856›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Emergent elasticity in the neural code for space.

Samuel A Ocko, Kiah Hardcastle, Lisa M Giocomo, Surya Ganguli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Modeling Grid Cell Distortions with a Grid Cell Calibration Mechanism.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  14. A consistent map in the medial entorhinal cortex supports spatial memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bayesian inference in ring attractor networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel A OckoDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; samocko@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3426-4517
Kiah HardcastleDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Lisa M GiocomoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Surya GanguliDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Training Program in Basic NeuroscienceT32MH020016 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Justin L Gardner, Merritt C Maduke · 1997 to 2026
$16.2M
The Ionic Basis of Spatial Codes in Medial Entorhinal CortexR01MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Spatial Codes Across the Medial Entorhinal Cortex for Memory and NavigationR56MH106475 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GIOCOMO, LISA · 2020 to 2020
$398k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH106475NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon encountering a novel environment, an animal must construct a consistent environmental map, as well as an internal estimate of its position within that map, by combining information from two distinct sources: self-motion cues and sensory landmark cues. How do known aspects of neural circuit dynamics and synaptic plasticity conspire to accomplish this feat? Here we show analytically how a neural attractor model that combines path integration of self-motion cues with Hebbian plasticity in synaptic weights from landmark cells can self-organize a consistent map of space as the animal explores an environment. Intriguingly, the emergence of this map can be understood as an elastic relaxation process between landmark cells mediated by the attractor network. Moreover, our model makes several experimentally testable predictions, including (

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaElasticityEntorhinal CortexExploratory BehaviorFeedback, SensoryLearningNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSpace Perceptionattractor dynamicsgrid cellsnavigationspatial memorytheoretical neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30482856
PMCPMC6294895
OpenAlexW2950336521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.