Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482744›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2018

How Self-Directed e-Learning Contributes to Training for Medical Licentiate Practitioners in Zambia: Evaluation of the Pilot Phase of a Mixed-Methods Study.

Sandra Barteit, Albrecht Jahn, Annel Bowa, Sigrid Lüders, Gregory Malunga, Clemence Marimo, Sigrid Wolter, Florian Neuhann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Education and information technologies · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Barteit *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-6027
Albrecht JahnHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-9795
Annel BowaChainama College of Health Sciences, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-7624
Sigrid LüdersSolidarMed, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-8547
Gregory MalungaChainama College of Health Sciences, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8779-2917
Clemence MarimoSchool of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-3256
Sigrid WolterSolidarMed, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-3395
Florian NeuhannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-1597
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZambia faces a severe shortage of health workers, particularly in rural areas. To tackle this shortage, the Medical Licentiate program was initiated at Chainama College of Health Sciences in the capital, Lusaka, in 2002. The objective of the program was to alleviate the shortage of human resources in curative care. On-the-job training is conducted in decentralized teaching hospitals throughout Zambia. However, the program faces significant challenges such as shortages of senior medical instructors and learning materials.

objectiveOur aim was to address these challenges by introducing a self-directed, e-learning platform with an offline tablet as part of a collaborative blended-learning intervention to supplement local teaching and training.

methodsThe pilot phase of the e-learning platform was evaluated using a mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design. Various methods were employed to test the data's adequacy and potential for generating valid results. Methods included questionnaires according to the technology acceptance model and information system success model by DeLone and McLean, semistructured interviews, learner diaries, pretesting, the collection of usage data, exam results, demographics, and informal feedback. Outcome measures included usage, adoption, efficiency, acceptance, user-friendliness, and gained knowledge and skills.

resultsIn total, 52 students and 17 medical instructors participated in the pilot evaluation. The questionnaire results showed a high acceptance of the technology (>80%) and high agreement (>75%) with the e-learning platform. Semistructured interview results showed an overall appreciation of the e-learning intervention, but the need for more e-learning materials. Respondents identified a need for multimedia materials that transfer skills such as medical procedure visualization and interactive exercises to practice procedural knowledge. The learning diaries identified the lack of specific learning materials and potential shortcomings of existing learning materials. However, students were satisfied with the current e-learning content. The majority of students used the e-learning platform offline on their tablets; online e-learning was underutilized.

conclusionsThe pilot phase of the tablet-based e-learning platform to support the self-directed learning intervention was well received and appreciated by students and medical instructors of Chainama College of Health Sciences. E-learning for knowledge acquisition appears to be adequate and feasible for this low-resource educational environment. Our evaluation results guide the further development of the full implementation of the e-learning platform in this educational setting. E-learning materials should reflect curriculum requirements, and additional multimedia and interactive content is needed, as well as improved integration and active participation from medical instructors in the e-learning processes.

Indexed as

adoptioneffectivenessevaluationhealth care workersinterventionmedical e-learningrural healthsub-Saharan Africasustainability

Identifiers

PMID30482744
PMCPMC6290268
OpenAlexW2889606463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.