Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482741›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2018

Predictive Modeling of 30-Day Emergency Hospital Transport of Patients Using a Personal Emergency Response System: Prognostic Retrospective Study.

Jorn Op den Buijs, Mariana Simons, Sara Golas, Nils Fischer, Jennifer Felsted, Linda Schertzer, Stephen Agboola, Joseph Kvedar, Kamal Jethwani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Home-based monitoring of falls using wearable sensors in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorn Op den BuijsPhilips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-285X
Mariana SimonsPhilips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-059X
Sara GolasPartners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6155-9452
Nils FischerPartners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-1603
Jennifer FelstedPartners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-8703
Linda SchertzerPhilips Lifeline, Framingham, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-8466
Stephen AgboolaPartners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2161-8091
Joseph KvedarDepartment of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-2291
Kamal JethwaniPartners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Partners HealthCare, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-8002
Harvard University · USMass General Brigham · USPhilips (Netherlands) · NLPhilips (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelehealth programs have been successful in reducing 30-day readmissions and emergency department visits. However, such programs often focus on the costliest patients with multiple morbidities and last for only 30 to 60 days postdischarge. Inexpensive monitoring of elderly patients via a personal emergency response system (PERS) to identify those at high risk for emergency hospital transport could be used to target interventions and prevent avoidable use of costly readmissions and emergency department visits after 30 to 60 days of telehealth use.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to (1) develop and validate a predictive model of 30-day emergency hospital transport based on PERS data; and (2) compare the model's predictions with clinical outcomes derived from the electronic health record (EHR).

methodsWe used deidentified medical alert pattern data from 290,434 subscribers to a PERS service to build a gradient tree boosting-based predictive model of 30-day hospital transport, which included predictors derived from subscriber demographics, self-reported medical conditions, caregiver network information, and up to 2 years of retrospective PERS medical alert data. We evaluated the model's performance on an independent validation cohort (n=289,426). We linked EHR and PERS records for 1815 patients from a home health care program to compare PERS-based risk scores with rates of emergency encounters as recorded in the EHR.

resultsIn the validation cohort, 2.22% (6411/289,426) of patients had 1 or more emergency transports in 30 days. The performance of the predictive model of emergency hospital transport, as evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 0.779 (95% CI 0.774-0.785). Among the top 1% of predicted high-risk patients, 25.5% had 1 or more emergency hospital transports in the next 30 days. Comparison with clinical outcomes from the EHR showed 3.9 times more emergency encounters among predicted high-risk patients than low-risk patients in the year following the prediction date.

conclusionsPatient data collected remotely via PERS can be used to reliably predict 30-day emergency hospital transport. Clinical observations from the EHR showed that predicted high-risk patients had nearly four times higher rates of emergency encounters than did low-risk patients. Health care providers could benefit from our validated predictive model by targeting timely preventive interventions to high-risk patients. This could lead to overall improved patient experience, higher quality of care, and more efficient resource utilization.

Indexed as

accountable care organizationsdecision support techniquesemergency medical dispatchmachine learningpopulation health

Identifiers

PMID30482741
PMCPMC6290270
OpenAlexW2902118632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.