Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482246›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2018

A role for the unfolded protein response stress sensor ERN1 in regulating the response to MEK inhibitors in KRAS mutant colon cancers.

Tonći Šuštić, Sake van Wageningen, Evert Bosdriesz, Robert J D Reid, John Dittmar, Cor Lieftink, Roderick L Beijersbergen, Lodewyk F A Wessels, Rodney Rothstein, René Bernards

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. CRISPRingCancers · 2024
    Review
  11. CRISPR/Cas9: a powerful tool in colorectal cancer research.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tonći Šuštić *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Sake van Wageningen *Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Evert BosdrieszDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Robert J D ReidDepartment Genetics and Development, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
John DittmarDepartment Genetics and Development, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Cor LieftinkDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Roderick L BeijersbergenDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Lodewyk F A WesselsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Rodney RothsteinDepartment Genetics and Development, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA. rothstein@columbia.edu.
René BernardsDivision of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands. r.bernards@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLColumbia University · USOncode Institute · NL

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Recombination at DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Stalled Replication ForksR35GM118180 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rodney J. ROTHSTEIN · 2016 to 2026
$8.5M
CELL, MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF CANCERT32CA009503 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GAUTIER, JEAN · 1985 to 2016
$6.8M
Using synthetic dosage lethality to screen for novel anti-tumor targetsR33CA125520 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA125520NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009503NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutations in KRAS are frequent in human cancer, yet effective targeted therapeutics for these cancers are still lacking. Attempts to drug the MEK kinases downstream of KRAS have had limited success in clinical trials. Understanding the specific genomic vulnerabilities of KRAS-driven cancers may uncover novel patient-tailored treatment options.

methodsWe first searched for synthetic lethal (SL) genetic interactions with mutant RAS in yeast with the ultimate aim to identify novel cancer-specific targets for therapy. Our method used selective ploidy ablation, which enables replication of cancer-specific gene expression changes in the yeast gene disruption library. Second, we used a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9-based genetic screen in KRAS mutant human colon cancer cells to understand the mechanistic connection between the synthetic lethal interaction discovered in yeast and downstream RAS signaling in human cells.

resultsWe identify loss of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress sensor IRE1 as synthetic lethal with activated RAS mutants in yeast. In KRAS mutant colorectal cancer cell lines, genetic ablation of the human ortholog of IRE1, ERN1, does not affect growth but sensitizes to MEK inhibition. However, an ERN1 kinase inhibitor failed to show synergy with MEK inhibition, suggesting that a non-kinase function of ERN1 confers MEK inhibitor resistance. To investigate how ERN1 modulates MEK inhibitor responses, we performed genetic screens in ERN1 knockout KRAS mutant colon cancer cells to identify genes whose inactivation confers resistance to MEK inhibition. This genetic screen identified multiple negative regulators of JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) /JUN signaling. Consistently, compounds targeting JNK/MAPK8 or TAK1/MAP3K7, which relay signals from ERN1 to JUN, display synergy with MEK inhibition.

conclusionsWe identify the ERN1-JNK-JUN pathway as a novel regulator of MEK inhibitor response in KRAS mutant colon cancer. The notion that multiple signaling pathways can activate JUN may explain why KRAS mutant tumor cells are traditionally seen as highly refractory to MEK inhibitor therapy. Our findings emphasize the need for the development of new therapeutics targeting JUN activating kinases, TAK1 and JNK, to sensitize KRAS mutant cancer cells to MEK inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsEndoplasmic Reticulum StressEndoribonucleasesHEK293 CellsHumansMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyridonesPyrimidinonesUnfolded Protein ResponseAntineoplastic AgentsAZD 6244BenzimidazolesEndoribonucleasesERN1 protein, humanKRAS protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-junProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinibColon cancerERN1Ire1JNKJUNMEK inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID30482246
PMCPMC6258447
OpenAlexW2902557888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.