Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482240›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2018

The chicken gut metagenome and the modulatory effects of plant-derived benzylisoquinoline alkaloids.

Peng Huang, Yan Zhang, Kangpeng Xiao, Fan Jiang, Hengchao Wang, Dazhi Tang, Dan Liu, Bo Liu, Yisong Liu, Xi He and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 188 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
188citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

188 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 351 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Relationship BetweenVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

128 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peng HuangHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Yan ZhangAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Kangpeng XiaoHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Fan JiangAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Hengchao WangAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Dazhi TangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Dan LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bo LiuAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Yisong LiuHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Xi HeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Hua LiuNational and Local Union Engineering Research Center of Veterinary Herbal Medicine Resource and Initiative, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Xiubin LiuHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Zhixing QingHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Conghui LiuAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Jialu HuangHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Yuwei RenAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Long YunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Lijuan YinAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Qian LinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Cheng ZengHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Xiaogang SuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Jingyang YuanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Li LinHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Nanxi HuHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Hualiang CaoHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Sanwen HuangAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Yuming GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. guoyum@cau.edu.cn.
Wei FanAgricultural Genomic Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China. fanwei@caas.cn.
Jianguo ZengHunan Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China. zengjianguo@hunau.edu.cn.
Hunan Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAgricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNChina Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSub-therapeutic antibiotics are widely used as growth promoters in the poultry industry; however, the resulting antibiotic resistance threatens public health. A plant-derived growth promoter, Macleaya cordata extract (MCE), with effective ingredients of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids, is a potential alternative to antibiotic growth promoters. Altered intestinal microbiota play important roles in growth promotion, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown.

resultsWe generated 1.64 terabases of metagenomic data from 495 chicken intestinal digesta samples and constructed a comprehensive chicken gut microbial gene catalog (9.04 million genes), which is also the first gene catalog of an animal's gut microbiome that covers all intestinal compartments. Then, we identified the distinctive characteristics and temporal changes in the foregut and hindgut microbiota. Next, we assessed the impact of MCE on chickens and gut microbiota. Chickens fed with MCE had improved growth performance, and major microbial changes were confined to the foregut, with the predominant role of Lactobacillus being enhanced, and the amino acids, vitamins, and secondary bile acids biosynthesis pathways being upregulated, but lacked the accumulation of antibiotic-resistance genes. In comparison, treatment with chlortetracycline similarly enriched some biosynthesis pathways of nutrients in the foregut microbiota, but elicited an increase in antibiotic-producing bacteria and antibiotic-resistance genes.

conclusionThe reference gene catalog of the chicken gut microbiome is an important supplement to animal gut metagenomes. Metagenomic analysis provides insights into the growth-promoting mechanism of MCE, and underscored the importance of utilizing safe and effective growth promoters.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzylisoquinolinesChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGrowth SubstancesLactobacillusPlant ExtractsProbioticsRanunculalesBenzylisoquinolinesGrowth SubstancesPlant ExtractsAntibioticBenzylisoquinoline alkaloidChickenChlortetracyclineGrowth promoterGut metagenomeMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID30482240
PMCPMC6260706
OpenAlexW2902769857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.