ArticleVirology journal2018
Characterization of a PCV2d-2 isolate by experimental infection of pigs.
Article in Virology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Compromised Efficacy of the First Commercial Ready-to-Use Genotype 2d Porcine Circovirus Type 2 andViruses · 2025Article
- The pigeon circovirus evolution, epidemiology and interaction with the host immune system under One Loft Race rearing conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Inguinal lymph node sample collected by minimally invasive sampler helps to accurately diagnose ASF in dead pigs without necropsy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Maternally Derived Antibody Levels Influence on Vaccine Protection against PCV2d Challenge.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Cross-Sectional Study on the Sero- and Viral Dynamics of Porcine Circovirus Type 2 in the Field.Vaccines · 2020Article
- Construction of aIndian journal of microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), a highly prevalent, economically important swine pathogen is classified into different genotypes (PCV2a-f) based on phylogenetic analysis. Since the introduction of extensive vaccination programs, at least two major shifts have been observed in the prevalence of PCV2 genotypes. The first genotype shift from 2a towards 2b occurred around 2003, while in recent years, we are witnessing the second change in genotype prevalence from the predominant 2b towards 2d.In this study, a PCV2d-2 isolate was characterized as a potential challenge virus for the evaluation of PCV2 vaccine efficacy. Ten-week-old pigs carrying low to moderate levels of maternally derived antibodies to PCV2 were infected with the isolate by the nasal route. Over the next 4 weeks post-infection, the pigs were monitored for the presence of viremia, fecal virus excretion, and humoral immune responses. At the end of the post-infection observation period, samples were taken from the mediastinal and mesenteric lymph nodes of the animals and tested for viral load. The gradual depletion of maternally derived antibodies in the sera of piglets was demonstrated by ELISA and virus neutralization tests. Following experimental infection by PCV2d-2, specific IgM antibodies were first detected at 14 days post challenge (dpch), while IgG class antibodies were first detected at 21 dpch. Both viremia and virus shedding could be detected at 7 dpch, in 36 and 50% of the pigs, respectively. The proportion of shedders reached 100% by 14 dpch and remained at this level, while viremia was demonstrated in 86, 100, and 100% of the pigs at 14, 21, and 28 dpch, respectively. Both the mediastinal and mesenteric lymph nodes contained high levels of virus (7.6 and 8.5 log
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.