Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482189›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2018

In vitro and in vivo accumulation of magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles on implant materials with different magnetic properties.

Hilke Catherina Janßen, Dawid Peter Warwas, David Dahlhaus, Jessica Meißner, Piriya Taptimthong, Manfred Kietzmann, Peter Behrens, Janin Reifenrath, Nina Angrisani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directedJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Understanding the mechanisms of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hilke Catherina JanßenNIFE-Lower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Stadtfelddamm 34, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Dawid Peter WarwasInstitute for Inorganic Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 9, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
David DahlhausInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Jessica MeißnerInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 30559, Hannover, Germany. Jessica.meissner@tiho-hannover.de.
Piriya TaptimthongInstitute of Micro Production Technology, Leibniz University Hannover, An der Universität 2, 30823, Garbsen, Germany.
Manfred KietzmannInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Peter BehrensInstitute for Inorganic Chemistry, Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 9, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
Janin ReifenrathNIFE-Lower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Stadtfelddamm 34, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Nina AngrisaniNIFE-Lower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Stadtfelddamm 34, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Leibniz University Hannover · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) RE 3456/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn orthopedic surgery, implant-associated infections are still a major problem. For the improvement of the selective therapy in the infection area, magnetic nanoparticles as drug carriers are promising when used in combination with magnetizable implants and an externally applied magnetic field. These implants principally increase the strength of the magnetic field resulting in an enhanced accumulation of the drug loaded particles in the target area and therewith a reduction of the needed amount and the risk of undesirable side effects. In the present study magnetic nanoporous silica core-shell nanoparticles, modified with fluorophores (fluorescein isothiocyanate/FITC or rhodamine B isothiocyanate/RITC) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), were used in combination with metallic plates of different magnetic properties and with a magnetic field. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to investigate particle accumulation and retention and their biocompatibility.

resultsSpherical magnetic silica core-shell nanoparticles with reproducible superparamagnetic behavior and high porosity were synthesized. Based on in vitro proliferation and viability tests the modification with organic fluorophores and PEG led to highly biocompatible fluorescent particles, and good dispersibility. In a circular tube system martensitic steel 1.4112 showed superior accumulation and retention of the magnetic particles in comparison to ferritic steel 1.4521 and a Ti90Al6V4 control. In vivo tests in a mouse model where the nanoparticles were injected subcutaneously showed the good biocompatibility of the magnetic silica nanoparticles and their accumulation on the surface of a metallic plate, which had been implanted before, and in the surrounding tissue.

conclusionWith their superparamagnetic properties and their high porosity, multifunctional magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles are ideal candidates as drug carriers. In combination with their good biocompatibility in vitro, they have ideal properties for an implant directed magnetic drug targeting. Missing adverse clinical and histological effects proved the good biocompatibility in vivo. Accumulation and retention of the nanoparticles could be influenced by the magnetic properties of the implanted plates; a remanent martensitic steel plate significantly improved both values in vitro. Therefore, the use of magnetizable implant materials in combination with the magnetic nanoparticles has promising potential for the selective treatment of implant-associated infections.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersFemaleHep G2 CellsHumansMagnetic FieldsMagnetite NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanoporesNIH 3T3 CellsSilicon DioxideBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CarriersMagnetite NanoparticlesSilicon DioxideBiocompatibilityCore–shell nanoparticlesDrug targetingFerritic steelMartensitic steelMouse modelNanoporous silicaPEGylationSuperparamagnetic Fe3O4

Identifiers

PMID30482189
PMCPMC6258308
OpenAlexW2902454793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.