Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482176›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Multi-arm multi-stage trials can improve the efficiency of finding effective treatments for stroke: a case study.

Thomas Jaki, James M S Wason

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04345289 (Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Convalescent Plasma for Adults With COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Double-blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04345289 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Convalescent Plasma for Adults With COVID-19 Pneumonia. A Double-blinded, Randomized, Multicenter Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas BenfieldRan2020 to 2021Enrolled147ConditionsCOVID, Corona Virus Infection, Viral PneumoniaArmsConvalescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma, Infusion placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas JakiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, UK.
James M S WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK. james.wason@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-126X

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-SRF-2015-08-001Department of Health SRF-2015-08-001Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/6Medical Research Council SLAH/210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany recent Stroke trials fail to show a beneficial effect of the intervention late in the development. Currently a large number of new treatment options are being developed. Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) designs offer one potential strategy to avoid lengthy studies of treatments without beneficial effects while at the same time allowing evaluation of several novel treatments. In this paper we provide a review of what MAMS designs are and argue that they are of particular value for Stroke trials. We illustrate this benefit through a case study based on previous published trials of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We show in this case study that MAMS trials provide additional power for the same sample size compared to alternative trial designs. This level of additional power depends on the recruitment length of the trial, with most efficiency gained when recruitment is relatively slow. We conclude with a discussion of additional considerations required when starting a MAMS trial.

conclusionMAMS trial designs are potentially very useful for stroke trials due to their improved statistical power compared to the traditional approach.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresResearch DesignAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicBrain IschemiaData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeStrokeTreatment OutcomeAdaptive designClinical trial designMulti-arm multi-stage trialsMulti-arm trials

Identifiers

PMID30482176
PMCPMC6260683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.