Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30482164›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Assessing the social climate of physical (in)activity in Canada.

Lira Yun, Leigh Vanderloo, Tanya R Berry, Amy E Latimer-Cheung, Norman O'Reilly, Ryan E Rhodes, John C Spence, Mark S Tremblay, Guy Faulkner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise in Health Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Motives of Future Elementary School Teachers to Be Physically Active.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. How Could Peers in Online Health Community Help Improve Health Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lira YunSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Lower Mall Research Station 337, 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Leigh VanderlooParticipACTION, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tanya R BerryFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Amy E Latimer-CheungSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Norman O'ReillyCollege of Business and Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Ryan E RhodesSchool of Exercise Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
John C SpenceFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mark S TremblayHealthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Guy FaulknerSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Lower Mall Research Station 337, 2259 Lower Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada. guy.faulkner@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-2536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological models suggest that a strategy for increasing physical activity participation within a population is to reconstruct the "social climate". This can be accomplished through 1) changing norms and beliefs, 2) providing direct support for modifying environments, and 3) implementing policies to encourage physical activity. Nevertheless, surveillance efforts have paid limited attention to empirical assessment of social climate. This study responds to this gap by assessing the social climate of physical activity in Canada.

methodsA representative sample of Canadian adults (n = 2519, male/female = 50.3%/49.7%, M

resultsPhysical inactivity was considered a serious public health concern by 55% of the respondents; similar to unhealthy diets (58%) and tobacco use (57%). Thirty-nine percent of the respondents reported that they often see other people exercising. Twenty-eight percent of the sample believed that society disapproves of physical inactivity. The majority of respondents (63%) viewed the cause of physical inactivity as both an individual responsibility and other factors beyond an individuals' control. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported physical inactivity as being both a private matter and a public health matter. Strong support existed for environmental-, individual-, and economic-level policies but much less for legislative approaches. The social climate indicators were associated with respondents' level of physical activity participation and demographic variables in expected directions.

conclusionThis study is the first known attempt to assess social climate at a national level, addressing an important gap in knowledge related to advocating for, and implementing population-level physical activity interventions. Future tracking will be needed to identify any temporal (in)stability of these constructs over time and to explore the relationship between physical activity participation and indicators of the national social climate of physical activity.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorSocial EnvironmentAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEcological modelPhysical activityPolicyPublic opinionSocial climate

Identifiers

PMID30482164
PMCPMC6258462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.