Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481650›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Electrophysiological evidence for changes in attentional orienting and selection in functional somatic symptoms.

Maayan Karlinski, Alexander Jones, Bettina Forster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maayan KarlinskiCognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, City, University of London, London, UK; Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Alexander JonesMiddlesex University, London, UK.
Bettina ForsterCognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, City, University of London, London, UK. Electronic address: b.forster@city.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated changes in attention mechanisms in people who report a high number of somatic symptoms which cannot be associated with a physical cause.

methodBased on scores on the Somatoform Disorder Questionnaire (SDQ-20; Nijenhuis et al., 1996) we compared two non-clinical groups, one with high symptoms on the SDQ-20 and a control group with low or no symptoms. We recorded EEG whilst participants performed an exogenous tactile attention task where they had to discriminate between tactile targets following a tactile cue to the same or opposite hand.

resultsThe neural marker of attentional orienting to the body, the Late Somatosensory Negativity (LSN), was diminished in the high symptoms group and attentional modulation of touch processing was prolonged at mid and enhanced at later latency stages in this group.

conclusionThese results confirm that attentional processes are altered in people with somatic symptoms, even in a non-clinical group. Furthermore, the observed pattern fits explanations of changes in prior beliefs or expectations leading to diminished amplitudes of the marker of attentional orienting to the body (i.e. the LSN) and enhanced attentional gain of touch processing. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that high somatic symptoms are associated with neurocognitive attention changes.

Indexed as

Medically Unexplained SymptomsAdolescentAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrientationRandom AllocationSurveys and QuestionnairesTouchYoung AdultAttention, medically unexplained symptomsERPsFunctional somatic symptomsSDQTactile

Identifiers

PMID30481650
PMCPMC6318479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.