Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481508›Full record

ArticleHuman pathology2019

Clinical validation of coexisting driver mutations in colorectal cancers.

Gang Zheng, Li-Hui Tseng, Lisa Haley, Junaid Ibrahim, Jennifer Bynum, Rena Xian, Christopher D Gocke, James R Eshleman, Ming-Tseh Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang ZhengDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: gzheng5@jhmi.edu.
Li-Hui TsengDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100,Taiwan.
Lisa HaleyDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Junaid IbrahimDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jennifer BynumDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Rena XianDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Christopher D GockeDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
James R EshlemanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Ming-Tseh LinDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutational profiling is recommended for selecting targeted therapy and predicting prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Detection of coexisting mutations within the same pathway, which are usually mutually exclusive, raises the concern for potential laboratory errors. In this retrospective study for quality assessment of a next-generation sequencing assay, we examined BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS genes within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the PIK3CA gene within the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (mTOR) pathway in 744 CRC specimens submitted to our clinical diagnostics laboratory. Although coexistence of mutations between the MAPK and mTOR pathways was observed, it rarely occurred within the MAPK pathway. Retrospective quality assessments identified false detection of coexisting activating KRAS and NRAS mutations in 1 specimen and confirmed 2 activating KRAS mutations in 2 specimens and coexisting activating KRAS and NRAS mutations in 2 specimens, but no coexisting activating RAS and BRAF mutations. There were 15 CRCs with a kinase-impaired BRAF mutation, including 3 with a coexisting activating KRAS mutation, which may have therapeutic implications. Multiregional analysis based on different histologic features demonstrated that coexisting KRAS and NRAS mutations may be present in the same or different tumor populations and showed that invasion of adenomas by synchronous adenocarcinomas of different clonal origin may result in detection of coexisting mutations within the MAPK pathway. In this study, we proposed an operating procedure for clinical validation of unexpected coexisting mutations. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the biological significance and clinical implications of coexisting mutations within the MAPK pathway.

Indexed as

MutationAllelesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisGene FrequencyGTP PhosphohydrolasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMembrane ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAFCoexisting mutationColorectal cancerKRASNRASPIK3CA

Identifiers

PMID30481508
PMCPMC6467705
OpenAlexW2901261663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.