Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481382›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Hospital at Home-Plus: A Platform of Facility-Based Care.

Linda V DeCherrie, Ania Wajnberg, Tacara Soones, Christian Escobar, Elisse Catalan, Sara Lubetsky, Bruce Leff, Alex Federman, Albert Siu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A research agenda for hospital at home.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linda V DeCherrieDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Ania WajnbergDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Tacara SoonesDepartment of General Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christian EscobarDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Elisse CatalanDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Sara LubetskyDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Bruce LeffDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alex FedermanDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Albert SiuDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Funding

Residing in the Community with Dementia at the End of Life: Understanding Hospice Use and Residential SettingP30AG028741 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ORNA INTRATOR · 2010 to 2026
$21.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the evolution of a hospital at home (HaH) program to a HaH with a 30-day posthospitalization transition period (HaH-Plus) and results of a retrospective review of cases.

designAfter launching HaH-Plus, we used the same interdisciplinary clinical team to provide acute home-based care for a broader range of home-based acute-level services than originally conceived in the Hospital at Home model. These included a palliative care unit at home (PCUaH), an observation unit at home (OUaH), a post-acute care rehabilitation at home (RaH), and a program for the hospital averse - those patients needing to be in the hospital but who refuse.

settingUrban health system.

participantsIndividuals 18 years or older residing in specified catchment area with Medicare fee-for-service or accepted Medicare/Medicaid Advantage plans requiring facility-based care.

interventionProvision of facility-based acute-level care at home to 685 participants. MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay, readmission, and mortality.

resultsHaH-Plus cared for 685 individuals. The PCUaH had the oldest participants (mean age 87), and all groups were predominantly female and dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Diagnoses and length of stay were similar in all groups except that those in RaH had a larger group of diagnoses, than those accepted in to HaH-Plus and those in OUaH had a shorter stay. Rate of readmission was highest for RaH (19%). Mortality during the active treatment episode was highest for PCUaH and hospital averse as compared to HaH-Plus, OUaH and RaH.

conclusionProviding a broader range of facility-based care in the home has significant advantages for patients and increases the scalability of HaH. Developing a spectrum of services was possible by leveraging a robust, 24-hour HaH team. Community- and home-based care could become a greater part of the U.S. healthcare system if a platform of HaH services along with advances in technology and payment models were developed. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:596-602, 2019.

Indexed as

Clinical Observation UnitsHome Care ServicesPalliative CareSubacute CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMedicare Part CMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionProgram EvaluationUnited Stateshome-based medical carehospital at homepostacute care

Identifiers

PMID30481382
PMCPMC12964374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.