ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2019
Sarcolemmal Complement Membrane Attack Complex Deposits During Acute Rejection of Myofibers in Nonhuman Primates.
Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have previously studied in nonhuman primates several aspects of the acute rejection of myofibers, including the histological characteristics, the mechanisms of myofiber elimination by the T cells, and the development of anti-donor antibodies. Here, we report the participation of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC) in this context. We used muscle sections of macaques from experiments of allogeneic muscle precursor cell transplantation with confirmed rejection of the graft-derived myofibers. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, alizarin red and for immunodetection of MAC, CD8, CD4, C3, C4d, and immunoglobulins. The prominent finding was the presence of sarcolemmal MAC (sMAC) deposits in biopsies with ongoing acute rejection or with recent acute rejection. The numbers of sMAC-positive myofibers were variable, being higher when there was an intense lymphocyte infiltration. Few sMAC-positive myofibers were necrotic or had evidence of sarcolemma permeation. The immunodetection of C3, C4d, and immunoglobulins did not provide significant elements. In conclusion, sMAC deposits were related to myofiber rejection. The fact that the vast majority of sMAC-positive myofibers had no signs of necrosis or sarcolemmal permeation suggests that MAC would not be harmful to myofibers by itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.