Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481286›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2019

Specific inhibition of myostatin activation is beneficial in mouse models of SMA therapy.

Kimberly K Long, Karen M O'Shea, Ramzi J Khairallah, Kelly Howell, Sergey Paushkin, Karen S Chen, Shaun M Cote, Micah T Webster, Joseph P Stains, Erin Treece and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly K LongScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Karen M O'SheaMyologica, 10811 Dewey Way East, New Market, MD.
Ramzi J KhairallahMyologica, 10811 Dewey Way East, New Market, MD.
Kelly HowellSMA Foundation, 888 7th Avenue #400, New York, NY.
Sergey PaushkinSMA Foundation, 888 7th Avenue #400, New York, NY.
Karen S ChenSMA Foundation, 888 7th Avenue #400, New York, NY.
Shaun M CoteScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Micah T WebsterScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Joseph P StainsDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Erin TreeceScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Alan BucklerScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Adriana DonovanScholar Rock Inc., 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA.
Scholar Rock (United States) · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by loss of α-motor neurons, leading to profound skeletal muscle atrophy. Patients also suffer from decreased bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. The majority of treatments for SMA, approved or in clinic trials, focus on addressing the underlying cause of disease, insufficient production of full-length SMN protein. While restoration of SMN has resulted in improvements in functional measures, significant deficits remain in both mice and SMA patients following treatment. Motor function in SMA patients may be additionally improved by targeting skeletal muscle to reduce atrophy and improve muscle strength. Inhibition of myostatin, a negative regulator of muscle mass, offers a promising approach to increase muscle function in SMA patients. Here we demonstrate that muSRK-015P, a monoclonal antibody which specifically inhibits myostatin activation, effectively increases muscle mass and function in two variants of the pharmacological mouse model of SMA in which pharmacologic restoration of SMN has taken place either 1 or 24 days after birth to reflect early or later therapeutic intervention. Additionally, muSRK-015P treatment improves the cortical and trabecular bone phenotypes in these mice. These data indicate that preventing myostatin activation has therapeutic potential in addressing muscle and bone deficiencies in SMA patients. An optimized variant of SRK-015P, SRK-015, is currently in clinical development for treatment of SMA.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalDisease Models, AnimalMiceMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscular Atrophy, SpinalMyostatinSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 ProteinAntibodies, MonoclonalMstn protein, mouseMyostatinSmn1 protein, mouseSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID30481286
PMCPMC6423420
OpenAlexW2912779195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.