ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
EpistasisRank and EpistasisKatz: interaction network centrality methods that integrate prior knowledge networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the Solubility of Elemental Sulfur (S) in Sulfur-Containing Natural Gas with Machine Learning Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- EPIMUTESTR: a nearest neighbor machine learning approach to predict cancer driver genes from the evolutionary action of coding variants.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Consensus features nested cross-validation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Multi-Level Model to Predict Antibody Response to Influenza Vaccine Using Gene Expression Interaction Network Feature Selection.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- The role of systems biology approaches in determining molecular signatures for the development of more effective vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAn important challenge in gene expression analysis is to improve hub gene selection to enrich for biological relevance or improve classification accuracy for a given phenotype. In order to incorporate phenotypic context into co-expression, we recently developed an epistasis-expression network centrality method that blends the importance of gene-gene interactions (epistasis) and main effects of genes. Further blending of prior knowledge from functional interactions has the potential to enrich for relevant genes and stabilize classification.
resultsWe develop two new expression-epistasis centrality methods that incorporate interaction prior knowledge. The first extends our SNPrank (EpistasisRank) method by incorporating a gene-wise prior knowledge vector. This prior knowledge vector informs the centrality algorithm of the inclination of a gene to be involved in interactions by incorporating functional interaction information from the Integrative Multi-species Prediction database. The second method extends Katz centrality to expression-epistasis networks (EpistasisKatz), extends the Katz bias to be a gene-wise vector of main effects and extends the Katz attenuation constant prefactor to be a prior-knowledge vector for interactions. Using independent microarray studies of major depressive disorder, we find that including prior knowledge in network centrality feature selection stabilizes the training classification and reduces over-fitting. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Methods and examples provided at https://github.com/insilico/Rinbix and https://github.com/insilico/PriorKnowledgeEpistasisRank. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.