Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481170›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

A Bayesian mixture modelling approach for spatial proteomics.

Oliver M Crook, Claire M Mulvey, Paul D W Kirk, Kathryn S Lilley, Laurent Gatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oliver M CrookComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5669-8506
Claire M MulveyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2989-2052
Paul D W KirkMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute for Public Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-7489
Kathryn S LilleyCambridge Centre for Proteomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0594-6543
Laurent GattoComputational Proteomics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1520-2268

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002817/1Medical Research Council MC_UP_0801/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/10Wellcome Trust 108467/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 110170/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of the spatial sub-cellular distribution of proteins is of vital importance to fully understand context specific protein function. Some proteins can be found with a single location within a cell, but up to half of proteins may reside in multiple locations, can dynamically re-localise, or reside within an unknown functional compartment. These considerations lead to uncertainty in associating a protein to a single location. Currently, mass spectrometry (MS) based spatial proteomics relies on supervised machine learning algorithms to assign proteins to sub-cellular locations based on common gradient profiles. However, such methods fail to quantify uncertainty associated with sub-cellular class assignment. Here we reformulate the framework on which we perform statistical analysis. We propose a Bayesian generative classifier based on Gaussian mixture models to assign proteins probabilistically to sub-cellular niches, thus proteins have a probability distribution over sub-cellular locations, with Bayesian computation performed using the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm, as well as Markov-chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC). Our methodology allows proteome-wide uncertainty quantification, thus adding a further layer to the analysis of spatial proteomics. Our framework is flexible, allowing many different systems to be analysed and reveals new modelling opportunities for spatial proteomics. We find our methods perform competitively with current state-of-the art machine learning methods, whilst simultaneously providing more information. We highlight several examples where classification based on the support vector machine is unable to make any conclusions, while uncertainty quantification using our approach provides biologically intriguing results. To our knowledge this is the first Bayesian model of MS-based spatial proteomics data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, TheoreticalProteomicsAlgorithmsAnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsMachine LearningMiceReproducibility of ResultsSubcellular FractionsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID30481170
PMCPMC6258510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.