ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
A Bayesian mixture modelling approach for spatial proteomics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reproducibility Crossroads: Impact of Statistical Choices on Proteomics Functional Enrichment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing sub-cellular resolution in spatial proteomics experiments.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2019Pooled it
- The spatial proteome of the Plasmodium falciparum schizont illuminates the composition and evolutionary trajectories of its organelles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Advances and Applications of Spatial Proteomics: From Organellar Maps to Clinical Translation.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Semi-supervised Bayesian integration of multiple spatial proteomics datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A Primer on Proteomic Characterization of Intercellular Communication in a Virus Microenvironment.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Review
- An updated Bioconductor workflow for correlation profiling subcellular proteomics.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Simultaneous proteome localization and turnover analysis reveals spatiotemporal features of protein homeostasis disruptions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Simultaneous proteome localization and turnover analysis reveals spatiotemporal features of protein homeostasis disruptions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Mapping diversity in African trypanosomes using high resolution spatial proteomics.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Regulation of Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism by Glutaredoxin 5 in the Apicomplexan Parasite Neospora caninum.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Autism Spectrum Disorder: Neurodevelopmental Risk Factors, Biological Mechanism, and Precision Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Reduced mitochondria provide an essential function for the cytosolic methionine cycle.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Semi-Supervised Non-Parametric Bayesian Modelling of Spatial Proteomics.The annals of applied statistics · 2022Article
- Inferring differential subcellular localisation in comparative spatial proteomics using BANDLE.Nature communications · 2022Article
- SubCellBarCode: integrated workflow for robust spatial proteomics by mass spectrometry.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Consensus clustering for Bayesian mixture models.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Challenges and Opportunities for Bayesian Statistics in Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2022Review
- Comparative Analysis of T-Cell Spatial Proteomics and the Influence of HIV Expression.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of the spatial sub-cellular distribution of proteins is of vital importance to fully understand context specific protein function. Some proteins can be found with a single location within a cell, but up to half of proteins may reside in multiple locations, can dynamically re-localise, or reside within an unknown functional compartment. These considerations lead to uncertainty in associating a protein to a single location. Currently, mass spectrometry (MS) based spatial proteomics relies on supervised machine learning algorithms to assign proteins to sub-cellular locations based on common gradient profiles. However, such methods fail to quantify uncertainty associated with sub-cellular class assignment. Here we reformulate the framework on which we perform statistical analysis. We propose a Bayesian generative classifier based on Gaussian mixture models to assign proteins probabilistically to sub-cellular niches, thus proteins have a probability distribution over sub-cellular locations, with Bayesian computation performed using the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm, as well as Markov-chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC). Our methodology allows proteome-wide uncertainty quantification, thus adding a further layer to the analysis of spatial proteomics. Our framework is flexible, allowing many different systems to be analysed and reveals new modelling opportunities for spatial proteomics. We find our methods perform competitively with current state-of-the art machine learning methods, whilst simultaneously providing more information. We highlight several examples where classification based on the support vector machine is unable to make any conclusions, while uncertainty quantification using our approach provides biologically intriguing results. To our knowledge this is the first Bayesian model of MS-based spatial proteomics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.