Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481110›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Immunogenicity and safety of intramuscular versus subcutaneous administration of a combined measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine to children 12 to 18 months of age.

Hervé Haas, Patrick Richard, Cécile Eymin, Anne Fiquet, Barbara Kuter, Benoit Soubeyrand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00402831 (An Open, Randomised, Comparative, Multicentre Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of ProQuad® When Administered by Intramuscular), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00402831 phase3completednot on this map

An Open, Randomised, Comparative, Multicentre Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of ProQuad® When Administered by Intramuscular (IM) Route or Subcutaneous (SC) Route to Healthy Children Aged 12 to 18 Months

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2006 to 2007Enrolled405ConditionsMeasles, Mumps, Rubella, VaricellaArmsProQuad®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Subcutaneous vaccine administration - an outmoded practice.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hervé Haasa Hôpitaux pédiatriques CHU Lenval , Nice , France.
Patrick Richardb Nîmes , France.
Cécile Eyminc Medical Affairs , Sanofi Pasteur MSD , Lyon , France.
Anne Fiquetc Medical Affairs , Sanofi Pasteur MSD , Lyon , France.
Barbara Kuterd Medical Affairs , Merck & Co., Inc , North Wales , PA , USA.
Benoit Soubeyrandc Medical Affairs , Sanofi Pasteur MSD , Lyon , France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized trial conducted in France compared intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) administration of two doses of a measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) combination vaccine (ProQuad®) administered one month apart to 405 children 12-18 months of age (NCT00402831). The 2-dose regimen of MMRV administered IM was shown to be as immunogenic as the 2-dose regimen administered SC for all antigens 6 weeks post-vaccination for the subjects who were initially seronegative for measles, mumps, rubella, or varicella (lower bounds of the two-sided 95% CIs for the difference in response rates for all antigens greater than -10% [range -2.1 for varicella to -3.0 for mumps]). The antibody response rates for all vaccine antigens 6 weeks after the second dose of MMRV were > 99% in both the IM and SC groups. Fewer subjects in the IM group experienced injection-site AEs compared with the SC group (17.8% and 28.6% post-dose 1, and 20.4% and 29.5% post-dose 2, respectively). From Day 0 to Day 4 post-dose 2, fewer subjects reported erythema and swelling in the IM group than in the SC group (15.4% and 27.0%, and 6.0% and 12.5%, respectively). In both groups, most injection-site AEs started during the first four days after vaccination; their intensity was mainly mild or ≤2.5 cm. The rates of fever were comparable between the two groups after each dose of MMRV. In conclusion, two doses of the MMRV vaccine were highly immunogenic and well tolerated when administered either SC or IM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00402831.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleImmunogenicity, VaccineInjections, IntramuscularInjections, SubcutaneousAntibodies, ViralChickenpoxChickenpox VaccineFemaleFeverFranceHumansInfantMaleMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineRubellaAntibodies, ViralChickenpox VaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccinemeasles, mumps, rubella, varicella vaccineVaccines, CombinedIMMeaslesmumpsProQuadroute of administrationrubellaSCvaricella vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30481110
PMCPMC6605874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.