Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481108›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

'I also want to be vaccinated!' - adolescent boys' awareness and thoughts, perceived benefits, information sources, and intention to be vaccinated against Human papillomavirus (HPV).

Maria Grandahl, Tryggve Nevéus, Tina Dalianis, Margareta Larsson, Tanja Tydén, Christina Stenhammar

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Grandahla Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-6656
Tryggve Nevéusa Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Tina Dalianisb Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden.
Margareta Larssona Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-621X
Tanja Tydéna Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-6527
Christina Stenhammara Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates boys' awareness and thoughts about human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccination, perceived benefits of vaccinating men, information sources and intention to be vaccinated against HPV. We used a qualitative approach and interviews were conducted with 31 upper secondary school male students. Two main themes 1)

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeImmunization ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentDecision MakingHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesQualitative ResearchSchoolsStudentsVaccinationYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesAwarenessboysequal healthgender neutral vaccinationhealth belief modelhuman papillomavirusimmunization programschool healthsex-neutral vaccination

Identifiers

PMID30481108
PMCPMC6746528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.