Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30481095›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2019

Effect of Cultural, Folk, and Religious Beliefs and Practices on Delays in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer in African American Women.

Patricia G Moorman, Nadine J Barrett, Frances Wang, J Anthony Alberg, Elisa V Bandera, J B Barnholtz-Sloan, Melissa Bondy, Michele L Cote, Ellen Funkhouser, Linda E Kelemen and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia G Moorman1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Nadine J Barrett1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Frances Wang1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
J Anthony Alberg2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Elisa V Bandera3 Department of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
J B Barnholtz-Sloan4 Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Melissa Bondy5 Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Michele L Cote6 Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Ellen Funkhouser7 Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Linda E Kelemen8 Department of Public Health Sciences, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Lauren C Peres9 Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Edwards S Peters10 Epidemiology Program, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana.
A G Schwartz6 Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Paul D Terry11 Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Sydnee Crankshaw1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah E Abbott12 Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
Joellen M Schildkraut13 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Duke University · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USHunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer in African-American WomenR01CA142081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SCHILDKRAUT, JOELLEN M. · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain cultural, folk, and religious beliefs that are more common among African Americans (AAs) have been associated with later-stage breast cancer. It is unknown if these beliefs are similarly associated with delays in diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

methodsData from a multicenter case-control study of ovarian cancer in AA women were used to examine associations between cultural/folk beliefs and religious practices and stage at diagnosis and symptom duration before diagnosis. Associations between cultural/folk beliefs or religious practices and stage at diagnosis were assessed with logistic regression analyses, and associations with symptom duration with linear regression analyses.

resultsAgreement with several of the cultural/folk belief statements was high (e.g., 40% agreed that "if a person prays about cancer, God will heal it without medical treatments"), and ∼90% of women expressed moderate to high levels of religiosity/spirituality. Higher levels of religiosity/spirituality were associated with a twofold increase in the odds of stage III-IV ovarian cancer, whereas agreement with the cultural/folk belief statements was not associated with stage. Symptom duration before diagnosis was not consistently associated with cultural/folk beliefs or religiosity/spirituality.

conclusionsWomen who reported stronger religious beliefs or practices had increased odds of higher stage ovarian cancer. Inaccurate cultural/folk beliefs about cancer treament were not associated with stage; however, these beliefs were highly prevalent in our population and could impact patient treatment decisions. Our findings suggest opportunities for health education interventions, especially working with churches, and improved doctor-patient communication.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesFemaleFolkloreHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsReligionSurveys and QuestionnairesTime-to-TreatmentYoung AdultAfrican Americanscultural beliefsfolk beliefsovarian cancerreligion

Identifiers

PMID30481095
PMCPMC6482889
OpenAlexW2902288282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.