Trial reportJAMA2018
Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02586805 (HELP Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 135 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HELP Study: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate DX-2930 For Long-Term Prophylaxis Against Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
Who cites it
135 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 286 citations in OpenAlex.
- International Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Patients With Hereditary Angioedema.Allergy · 2026Guideline
- Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Therapies for Long-Term Prophylactic Treatment of Patients with Hereditary Angioedema.Drugs in R&D · 2025Pooled it
- Indirect treatment comparison of lanadelumab and a C1-esterase inhibitor in pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Pooled it
- Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in Patients Receiving Long-Term Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for the long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Psychology and hereditary angioedema: A systematic review.Allergy and asthma proceedings · 2021Pooled it
- Intravenous lanadelumab for the treatment of moderately ill COVID-19 patients.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Lanadelumab safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in patients aged ≥12 with hereditary angioedema in China: an open-label, multicenter study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Trial
- Exposure-Response Analysis of Donidalorsen for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Phase III OASIS-HAE Study of Donidalorsen for Hereditary Angioedema.Allergy · 2025Trial
- Sustained Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Long-Term Prophylaxis with Lanadelumab in Hereditary Angioedema: The Prospective, Phase 4, Noninterventional EMPOWER Real-World Study.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between garadacimab and lanadelumab for the long-term prophylactic treatment of patients with hereditary angioedema.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Trial
- Effective long-term prophylaxis with lanadelumab in adolescents with hereditary angioedema: EMPOWER/ENABLE.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of garadacimab for preventing hereditary angioedema attacks: Phase 3 open-label extension study.Allergy · 2025Trial
- Lanadelumab for prevention of attacks of non-histaminergic normal C1 inhibitor angioedema: results from the randomized, double-blind CASPIAN Study and CASPIAN open-label extension.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks with lanadelumab: The HELP OLE Study.Allergy · 2022Trial
- Impact of lanadelumab on health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema in the HELP study.Allergy · 2021Trial
- Lanadelumab demonstrates rapid and sustained prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.Allergy · 2020Trial
- Prekallikrein: the catalytic crossroads of inflammation and thrombosis.Current opinion in hematology · 2026Review
- Experiences From the First Year of Using Garadacimab to Treat Hereditary Angioedema and Acquired Angioedema.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedData Error.2019
Authors and funding
36 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Current treatments for long-term prophylaxis in hereditary angioedema have limitations. Objective: To assess the efficacy of lanadelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits active plasma kallikrein, in preventing hereditary angioedema attacks. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 41 sites in Canada, Europe, Jordan, and the United States. Patients were randomized between March 3, 2016, and September 9, 2016; last day of follow-up was April 13, 2017. Randomization was 2:1 lanadelumab to placebo; patients assigned to lanadelumab were further randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of the 3 dose regimens. Patients 12 years or older with hereditary angioedema type I or II underwent a 4-week run-in period and those with 1 or more hereditary angioedema attacks during run-in were randomized. Interventions: Twenty-six-week treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (n = 28), 300 mg every 4 weeks (n = 29), 300 mg every 2 weeks (n = 27), or placebo (n = 41). All patients received injections every 2 weeks, with those in the every-4-week group receiving placebo in between active treatments. Main Outcome and Measures: Primary efficacy end point was the number of investigator-confirmed attacks of hereditary angioedema over the treatment period. Results: Among 125 patients randomized (mean age, 40.7 years [SD, 14.7 years]; 88 females [70.4%]; 113 white [90.4%]), 113 (90.4%) completed the study. During the run-in period, the mean number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month in the placebo group was 4.0; for the lanadelumab groups, 3.2 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 3.7 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 3.5 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. During the treatment period, the mean number of attacks per month for the placebo group was 1.97; for the lanadelumab groups, 0.48 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 0.53 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 0.26 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. Compared with placebo, the mean differences in the attack rate per month were -1.49 (95% CI, -1.90 to -1.08; P < .001); -1.44 (95% CI, -1.84 to -1.04; P < .001); and -1.71 (95% CI, -2.09 to -1.33; P < .001). The most commonly occurring adverse events with greater frequency in the lanadelumab treatment groups were injection site reactions (34.1% placebo, 52.4% lanadelumab) and dizziness (0% placebo, 6.0% lanadelumab). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with hereditary angioedema type I or II, treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab for 26 weeks significantly reduced the attack rate compared with placebo. These findings support the use of lanadelumab as a prophylactic therapy for hereditary angioedema. Further research is needed to determine long-term safety and efficacy. Trial Registration: EudraCT Identifier: 2015-003943-20; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02586805.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.