Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30480551›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2019

Further pharmacological comparison of D-methamphetamine and L-methamphetamine in rats: abuse-related behavioral and physiological indices.

Zhaoxia Xue, Justin N Siemian, Qing Zhu, Bruce E Blough, Jun-Xu Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Reinforcing and Stimulant-Like Effects of Methamphetamine Isomers in Rhesus Macaques.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaoxia XueDepartment of Medical Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan.
Justin N SiemianDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Qing ZhuSchool of Pharmacy, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Bruce E BloughCenter for Drug Discovery, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Jun-Xu LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USNantong University · CNRTI International · USShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

IMIDAZOLINE I2 RECEPTORS AS TARGETS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINR01DA034806 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
TAAR 1 modulation of addiction-related effects of nicotineR21DA040777 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2016 to 2017
$479k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034806NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous preclinical research suggests that L-methamphetamine (L -MA) has potential therapeutic utility to treat psychostimulant abuse. This study examined potential abuse-related and adverse physiological effects of D -MA and L -MA alone and in combination in rats, as these effects had not been previously characterized. Potential abuse-related effects were examined in locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference paradigms. Body temperature was monitored to assess the physiological effects of these drugs or drug combinations. In the locomotor study, D-MA induced locomotor sensitization to both D-MA and L -MA. L -MA induced locomotor sensitization only to D-MA. Responses to a combination of L-MA and D -MA were not differentially affected by L-MA or D-MA conditioning. In the conditioned place preference study, D-MA and L -MA each induced significant place preference. L -MA did not attenuate D-MA-induced place preference. In the body temperature study, D-MA induced hyperthermia and L -MA induced hypothermia. In combination, L -MA did not affect D-MA-induced hyperthermia. These data suggest that L -MA alone produces less abuse-related and adverse physiological effects than D-MA, but modulates and is modulated by concurrent and subsequent D-MA exposure, which may enhance the abuse liability of both drugs. These findings should be considered when L -MA is proposed for replacement therapy.

Indexed as

StereoisomerismAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, ClassicalFeverHypothermiaLocomotionMaleMethamphetamineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID30480551
PMCPMC6529304
OpenAlexW2900807084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.