Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30480119›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2017

Does Comprehensive Culture Change Adoption via the Household Model Enhance Nursing Home Residents' Psychosocial Well-being?

Linda Hermer, Natasha S Bryant, Madeline Pucciarello, Carolina Mlynarczyk, Bridget Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nursing Home Star Ratings and New Onset of Depression in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda HermerCenter for Applied Research, LeadingAge, Washington, DC.
Natasha S BryantCenter for Applied Research, LeadingAge, Washington, DC.
Madeline PucciarelloDepartment of Public Health, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Carolina MlynarczykDepartment of Public Health, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Bridget ZhongDepartment of Public Health, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSeveral studies suggest that to substantially improve residents' psychosocial well-being, traditional-model nursing homes should redesign themselves as small, homelike "households" along with comprehensively adopting other aspects of "culture change," a set of reforms meant to improve residents' quality of life. But this evidence mainly comes from qualitative studies. This comparative, observational study tested quantitatively whether residents in a household-model nursing home that had comprehensively adopted culture change reforms displayed greater positive affect, increased cognitive engagement, more extensive social interactions with staff and greater use of the environment than did residents at partial culture-change-adopting facilities with traditional, institutional environments. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsHousehold-model residents were matched on clinical and demographic factors with residents at two institutional control facilities that had partially adopted culture change and were observed for 8 hours each. To provide potentially converging evidence, aides and nurses were also observed. Finally, a culture change implementation assessment was conducted.

resultsThe implementation assessment showed that the household-model home had implemented culture change beyond national norms, whereas the control facilities were U.S.-typical partial adopters. It also revealed that household-model staff cared for residents in a more person-centered manner. Observation analyses revealed that household-model residents spent less time idle and less time stationary at wheelchair hubs. Moreover, although household-model residents did not spend the most time in the dining area overall, they spent the greatest percentage of time there talking with staff, displaying positive affect, and displaying active engagement. Finally, household-model residents and staff spent the most time in task-oriented interactions, including personal care. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that the intended psychosocial benefits materialize in household-model facilities, particularly in the dining area and in resident-staff relationships. The findings raise the possibility that facilities may be able to achieve these outcomes without entirely redesigning their environment.

Indexed as

Culture changeHousehold modelNursing homesPerson-centered carePsychosocial well-being

Identifiers

PMID30480119
PMCPMC6177048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.