ArticlePeerJ2018
Intake of supplementary food during pregnancy and lactation and its association with child nutrition in Timor Leste.
Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Influence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi Infection on Child Growth: A Secondary Analysis of the MAL-ED Birth Cohort Study.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Mapping Maternal Health in the New Media Environment: A Scientometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Article
- Dietary patterns and their association with breast milk macronutrient composition among lactating women.International breastfeeding journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThere is little evidence on maternal consumption of supplementary food on nutritional status of children. The objectives of this study were to measure the prevalence and determinants of supplementary food intake during pregnancy and lactation, and their association with nutritional status of under-five children in Timor Leste.
methodsCross-sectional data from Timor Leste Demographic and Health Survey on 5,993 mother (15-49 years) child dyads (<5 years) were included in the analysis. Self-reported intake of supplementary food intake was the explanatory variable. Child's nutritional status was assessed by stunting, wasting, and underweight and categorized according to WHO recommendations.
resultsThe prevalence of taking supplementary food during pregnancy and lactation was, respectively, 29.1% (95% CI [27.2-31.0]) 31.0% (95% CI [29.1-33.0]), and that of taking iron supplement during pregnancy was close to three-fifths (63.1%, 95% CI [60.9-65.3]). The odds of taking supplementary food during pregnancy and lactation were lower among those in the younger age groups and higher among urban residents. Compared with mothers who had supplementary food during pregnancy and lactation, those did not have had respectively 1.36 (OR = 1.360, 95% CI [1.191-2.072]) and 1.15 times (OR = 1.152, 95% CI [1.019-1.754]) higher odds of having stunted, and 1.30 (OR = 1.307, 95% CI [1.108-1.853]) and 1.43 (OR = 1.426, 95% CI [1.140-1.863]) times higher odds of having underweight children. Those who had none of the supplements had respectively 1.67 (OR = 1.674, 95% CI [1.118-2.087]) and 1.63 (OR = 1.631, 95% CI [1.130-2.144]) times higher odds of having stunted and underweight children.
conclusionA great majority of the mothers in Timor Leste are not taking supplementary food during pregnancy and lactation. We found a positive relationship between supplementary food intake during pregnancy and lactation with stunting and wasting among under-five children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.