Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30479880›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018

Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function Using the qCSF Method With 10 Digits.

Haiyan Zheng, Chenxiao Wang, Rong Cui, Xianghang He, Menglu Shen, Luis Andres Lesmes, Zhong-Lin Lu, Jia Qu, Fang Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation and comparison of three popular computer-based contrast sensitivity measurement techniques.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fixation Stability Deficits in Anisometropic Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A novel quick contrast sensitivity function test in Chinese adults with myopia and its related parameters.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haiyan ZhengSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chenxiao WangSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Rong CuiSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xianghang HeSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Menglu ShenSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Luis Andres LesmesAdaptive Sensory Technology, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Zhong-Lin LuCenter for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging, and Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jia QuSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Fang HouSchool of Ophthalmology & Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Efficient Assessment of Visual Deficits and Rehabilitation Methods in AmblyopiaR01EY021553 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LU, ZHONG-LIN · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Bayesian adaptive quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method with a 10-letter identification task provides an efficient CSF assessment. However, large populations are unfamiliar with letters and cannot benefit from this test. To overcome the barrier, we conducted this study.

methodA new font for digits (0∼9) was created. The digits were then filtered with a raised cosine filter, rescaled to different sizes to cover spatial frequencies from 0.5 to 16 cycles per degree (cpd), and used as stimuli in a 10-alternative forced choice (10AFC) digit identification task. With the 10AFC digit identification task, the CSFs of five young and five old observers were measured using the qCSF and Psi methods. The estimates from the latter served as reference.

resultsThe new digit font showed significantly improved similarity structure, Levene's test,

conclusionsThe qCSF with the 10 digit identification task is validated for both young and old observers. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The qCSF method with the 10-digit identification task provides an efficient and precise CSF test especially for people who are unfamiliar with letters.

Indexed as

Bayesian adaptive procedure, qCSFcontrast sensitivity functionprecisionSloan digit

Identifiers

PMID30479880
PMCPMC6238983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.