Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30479845›Full record

ArticleTranslational neuroscience2018

2D:4D Ratio Differs in Ischemic Stroke: A Single Center Experience.

Ke Yang, XianHui Ding, ZhiMing Zhou, XiaoLei Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ke YangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
XianHui DingDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
ZhiMing ZhouDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
XiaoLei ShiDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe index to ring finger length (2D:4D) ratio is a proxy biomarker for prenatal exposure of sex hormones. Sex hormones are associated with the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the association between 2D:4D and ischemic stroke. METHODOLOGY: This study retrospectively reviewed the data of 100 patients with first ever ischemic stroke between September, 2016 and June, 2017. The lengths of index finger and ring finger of both hands were measured using electronic calipers and calculated for 2D:4D ratios. Receive operating characteristic (ROC) mode was used to detect predicting performance of 2D:4D ratios for ischemic stroke.

results2D:4D ratios in ischemic stroke patients were higher than controls in both hands (P < 0.05), except right 2D:4D ratio in females. The ROC analyses showed that the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.635 (95%CI: 0.527-0.743) for left 2D:4D ratio, and 0.647 for right (95%CI: 0.539-0.755) (P < 0.05). The AUC of left and right 2D:4D ratio in male were 0.667 (95%CI: 0.514-0.820) and 0.670 (95%CI: 0.519-0.822) (P < 0.05). In female, no significance were found in ROC analysis. And there were no correlation between 2D:4D value and stroke severity (P > 0.05).

conclusionsThe current study indicated that the diagnostic value of 2D:4D ratio was limited in ischemic stroke. Further research is required to explore the role of it in screening ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

2D:4D ratiobiomarkerfinger lengthischemic stroke

Identifiers

PMID30479845
PMCPMC6234475
OpenAlexW2901950473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.