Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30479706›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research

Swati N Madhu, Kartik Kumar Jha, Annapoorna P Karthyayani, Devarshi Urvish Gajjar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Micelle nanogel-based drug delivery system for lutein in ocular administration.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  2. Exploring interspecies differences inJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swati N MadhuDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Kartik Kumar JhaDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Annapoorna P KarthyayaniDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Devarshi Urvish GajjarDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an infectious keratitis model using caprine (goat) corneas and to investigate the expression of virulence factors during infection.

methodsGoat eyes were surface-sterilized and dissected, and the corneas were placed on an agarose-gelatin solid support (0.5% in phosphate-buffered saline) in a 12-well culture plate containing 10% fetal bovine serum-supplemented culture medium for 3 weeks. Cell viability tests (trypan blue and MTT) were performed on the cultured corneas. Corneas were infected with

resultsGoat corneas with a viable epithelium could be maintained for 15 days.

conclusionGoat corneas can be used to evaluate the expression of virulence factors involved in

Indexed as

FusariumGoat CorneaKeratitisPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID30479706
PMCPMC6210866
OpenAlexW2898221162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.