Observational studyJournal of sports science & medicine2018
Training Quantification and Periodization during Live High Train High at 2100 M in Elite Runners: An Observational Cohort Case Study.
Observational study in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rating of perceived exertion in continuous sports: a scoping review with evidence gap map.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- Complex networks analysis reinforces centrality hematological role on aerobic-anaerobic performances of the Brazilian Paralympic endurance team after altitude training.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- A preliminary exploration of establishing a mice model of hypoxic training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Haemoglobin mass responses and performance outcomes among high-performance swimmers following a 3-week live-high, train-high camp at 2320 m.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- High-level performances following low altitude training and tapering in warm environments in elite racewalkers.European journal of sport science · 2024Article
- To the extreme! How biological anthropology can inform exercise physiology in extreme environments.Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology · 2023Review
- Effect of altitude training on the aerobic capacity of athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Intermittent hypoxia-induced enhancement of sociability and working memory associates with CNTNAP2 upregulation.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Influence of an Acute Exposure to a Moderate Real Altitude on Motoneuron Pool Excitability and Jumping Performance.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Nutrition and Altitude: Strategies to Enhance Adaptation, Improve Performance and Maintain Health: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Review
- Contemporary Periodization of Altitude Training for Elite Endurance Athletes: A Narrative Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The questionable efficacy of Live High Train High altitude training (LHTH) is compounded by minimal training quantification in many studies. We sought to quantify the training load (TL) periodization in a cohort of elite runners completing LHTH immediately prior to competition. Eight elite runners (6 males, 2 females) with a V̇O
Indexed as
Identifiers
30479529PMC6243625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.