ArticleKorean journal for food science of animal resources2018
Comparative Genome Analysis and Evaluation of Probiotic Characteristics of
Article in Korean journal for food science of animal resources, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating commensal and disease-associatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Enhanced Longevity and Immunity inFood science of animal resources · 2025Article
- Functional evaluation of synbiotic combination ofCurrent research in food science · 2025Article
- Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Potential probioticFrontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization of gut microbiome in weaning pigs supplemented with multi-strain probiotics using metagenomic, culturomic, and metabolomic approaches.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
- Complete genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2021Article
- Probiotic and Antifungal Attributes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomic and Functional Evaluations ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Review
- Expression and Purification of Extracellular Solute-Binding Protein (ESBP) inFood science of animal resources · 2019Article
- Beneficial roles of probiotics on the modulation of gut microbiota and immune response in pigs.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current study, the probiotic potential of approximately 250 strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from piglet fecal samples were investigated; among them
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.